Share Button

Children with Access to Guns: It’s a Problem

Disclaimer: This is not an anti-gun post. I own guns. It’s a pro-children and anti-stupidity post, intended to raise awareness.

Every month, a number of very young children accidentally shoot themselves and others. You don’t hear about it, because it rarely gets attention beyond local newspapers, but it’s happening with alarming frequency. At one time, guns were kept locked away, or children were strictly taught to not mess with guns in the home. But now, guns are everyday accessories–often of people who are untrained first-time gun owners–so it’s not surprising that many irresponsible parents leave guns laying around like their wallet or keys. It doesn’t help that many states, like Indiana, require no training whatsoever to own a gun or even carry one around in public (which should scare us all).

When you compile the stories, it becomes obvious that we have a problem on our hands. Here are incidents from just THE PAST THREE MONTHS.

JUNE 2018

Washington. A boy, 13, was playing with a .357 revolver when it fired, killing his 2-year-old brother.

Arizona. Two teen boys, 13 and 14, were “messing around” with a handgun when it discharged, killing the 14-year-old.

Tennessee. A mother was driving with her 13-year-old son and 12-year-old daughter. The boy began handling a handgun, and accidentally killed his sister.

Michigan. A girl, 4, found a loaded handgun in a toy closet and shot herself in the finger, which had to be amputated.

Louisiana. A 2-year-old boy accidentally shot himself in the leg after being left alone in a vehicle where a handgun was stored. The father, 24, had stepped out of the car to smoke a cigarette. He said he didn’t think the boy could reach the gun in the console.

Missouri. A man, 21, was sleeping when his 2-year-old niece picked up his loaded firearm and accientally killed herself with a shot to the chest.

Kentucky. A boy, 6, picked up a gun from the kitchen table and took it to his room, where he accidentally shot and killed himself.

Lousiana. As the mother napped on the porch, her 3-year-old picked up a loaded gun and shot himself in the arm.

Tennessee. A boy, 2, shot himself in the head after finding his mother’s handgun atop a dresser. She was in the room folding clothes, and didn’t think he could reach it.

Chicago. A boy, 8, found a 9mm handgun under a mattress and accidentally shot his 5-year-old brother.

Indiana. Two juveniles were playing with a gun when one, age 9, was shot in the finger.

New Orleans. A child was playing with a handgun when it fired, hitting a 7-year-old girl in the neck.

Las Vegas. Three brothers in a car were looking at a handgun, and accidentally fired the gun. All three were hit–one through the hand, the others in the hand and leg.

MAY 2018

Oklahoma. A boy, 15, dropped the magazine from a pistol, aimed it at his 17-year-old brother, and pulled the trigger, killing him. He said he didn’t know there was still a bullet in the chamber.

Ohio. A boy, 7, shot himself in the hand.

Ohio. An 8-year-old boy, after finding a handgun in a kitchen cupboard, pointed the gun at a 9-year-old cousin and shot him in the abdomen.

Virginia. A boy fired his father’s handgun, killing his two-year-old brother.

Virginia. A two-year-old boy died after shooting himself in the head with a .380 handgun while alone in an apartment room.

South Carolina. A young teen brought a handgun into a relative’s home. Another kid pulled the trigger, shooting a cousin in the neck and spine.

Utah. A two-year-old boy died after shooting himself in the head with his father’s handgun.

Louisiana. At a sleepover, a 14-year-old boy pointed a gun at another 14-year-old boy and shot him in the chest. He didn’t think the gun was loaded.

Louisiana. Children were pillow-fighting in an adult’s bedroom when a 9mm handgun fell from the bed. One child picked it up, and it discharged, striking a girl, 10, in the arm.

Virginia. A 4-year-old boy found a handgun in his apartment, fired it, and killed himself.

Minnesota. A 7-year-old boy, arriving home from school with a couple friends, found a loaded handgun in a box and accidentally killed himself.

Mississippi. A 12-year-old died after accidentally shooting himself.

Kansas City. A young boy critically wounded himself with a gun left unattended at home.

APRIL 2018

South Carolina. A boy, 2, took a gun from the car console and shot himself in the leg.

Louisiana. An 2-year-old boy accidentally shot his 8-year-old brother in the arm inside a parked car, using the handgun his father had left there.

Philadelphia. A boy, 4, found his father’s gun on a bed and shot himself in the leg.

Louisiana. Two boys on a porch, one of them twirling a .22 handgun on his finger, when he shot the other boy in the leg.

St. Louis. A 5-year-old boy looking for candy found a gun in a dresser drawer. He took it into the next room and accidentally killed his 7-year-old brother, who was playing videogames.

New Mexico. An 18-year-old shot an 8-year-old boy in the chest. He was playing around with a handgun, and thought the safety was on when he pointed it at the young boy and pulled the trigger.

Florida. A 2-year-old shot himself in the abdomen after getting hold of a gun in his parents’ home.

Indiana. A three-year-old girl found a handgun in their car and accidentally shot her 21-year-old pregnant mother in the upper back. The father was inside a store. A one-year-old boy was also in the car.

Share Button
Comments Off on Children with Access to Guns: It’s a Problem

Let Them Eat in Peace

There is nothing admirable or civil in kicking somebody out of a restaurant, somebody who just wants to have a peaceful meal with family. According to the Red Hen restaurant owner, Sarah Huckabee Sanders left without a fuss. Good for her. She’s the only person in that story whose actions I respect.

Then I heard Maxine Waters’ speech, calling for this kind of stuff to happen on a widespread basis–in restaurants, department stores, gas station. As a Christian, that disgusted me. Just imagine where such attitudes and behavior would take us–actually, probably WILL take us, since this snake is now out of the bag. I’m expecting more examples of this kind of ugliness in the days ahead. It could even become the norm.

Michelle Obama has modeled, “When they go low, we go high.” Well, looks to me like liberals decided they prefer going low.

I agree with David Axelrod: “I am kind of amazed and appalled by the number of folks on Left who applauded the expulsion. This, in the end, is a triumph for @realDonaldTrump vision of America: Now we’re divided by red plates & blue plates! #sad.”

I read one columnist who said this public shaming is justified–that the Administration’s actions in separating immigrant families are so despicable, drastic action is needed. But you can contrive what I’ll call “justified outrage” over any administration, of any party, at any point in time. Republicans will always have the abortion issue–“They are killing children, so we’re going to hound them wherever they go.” Democrats have a range of issues to get outraged about against Republicans–militarism, racism, policies affecting poor children, and more. There will always be something.

Who will step in to calm this stuff? I see nobody. Normally, you would look to the President. George W. Bush played that role after 9/11 to calm the anti-Muslim hysteria, which could have resulted in terrible domestic violence against everyday Muslims. I admired that, and America needed it. But the current President has never shown any interest in calming anything. Instead, after the Red Hen situation, he played his typical 7th grade Mean Girl role, tweeting out his usual juvenile insults. We desperately need grownups. God help us.

Share Button
Comments Off on Let Them Eat in Peace

How to Apologize for Real

We often hear really lame apologies, especially from politicians and celebrities after they do or say stupid things. Sometimes you can’t even call them real apologies. Like, “I deeply regret that people totally misunderstood what I said.” Or, “I had been drinking and can’t remember what I said, but I apologize for whatever I did that upset people.” Or, “I’m sorry if you were offended.” Or, “I want to apologize for not choosing my words more carefully.”

Jason Cundy, a former British soccer player, showed how to do it right. Mostly.

Vicki Sparks became the first woman on British TV to provide commentary on a World Cup soccer game. Jason Cundy didn’t like that. “I prefer to hear a male voice when watching football.” Especially at dramatic points in the game, “that moment needs to be done with a slightly lower voice.”

Cundy took a gob of criticism. And he responded with a real apology.

“I want to sincerely apologise for the comments I made on Good Morning Britain. I came away realising just how foolish and out of order they were and how I deserved the backlash I have received. There are times when you have to hold your hands up and admit you are wrong and have been an idiot–and this is definitely one of those times. I regret the comments and also the hurt and anger they causes. I realize there is absolutely on place for these demeaning attitudes towards female commentators, and I’m truly sorry.”

He put that out on Twitter. The next step would be to contact her personally and apologize (which perhaps he did).

Abraham Lincoln privately questioned a battlefield tactic of General U.S. Grant, but never expressed it to Grant. He later sent Grant a letter, apologizing for something Grant wasn’t even aware of. “I now wish to make the personal acknowledgment that you were right, and I was wrong.” That’s a big man.

Share Button
Comments Off on How to Apologize for Real

Showing the World What We are Capable of

Earlier this year, we (barely) recognized the 50th anniversary of the My Lai massacre. It was drowned out by the latest presidential tweets, but some attention squeaked through. Up to 500 Vietnamese–men, women, children, and infants–were massacred by a couple dozen American soldiers in two different hamlets. Some women were gang-raped and their bodies mutilated. It’s disturbing to think that Americans could do such a thing, but they did. WE did.

The entire world learned about My Lai. Learned what America was capable of. It’s a stain on our national character. But it was 50 years ago. There has been nothing similar since.

Then, during the Bush Administration, we had torture, Abu Graib, Guantanamo, renditions. We justified torturing prisoners, and we tortured a lot of them, routinely and repeatedly. News reports in countries around the world delivered the news–that the United States approved of torture. It shocked them, dashed their image of America.

Our current president approves of torture, but the nation won’t allow it. We’ve realized it’s wrong. Hopefully the world recognizes our about-face. And it’s been 15 years.

But now, in recent weeks, news outlets worldwide are showing pictures of US authorities forcing children away from their parents and taking them to special facilities. Most everyone, worldwide, is shocked by this. Don’t traumatize children: it’s kind of a universal value. And certainly don’t use them as bargaining chips to pursue a political agenda, as the administration admitted it was intentionally doing. I don’t think any of us are proud of this.

The world has seen, once again, that the United States is capable of great evil. And they are disappointed, because we’ve always stood for what’s right. And so much good still comes from us.

We stain our national character in other ways. We’ve got the world’s highest incarceration rate. Throw in the continual mass shootings, which no other nation experiences. We are among the world’s leaders in executing criminals, though most Western nations long ago rejected the death penalty. Throw in President Trump’s threats to use nuclear weapons, an idea the world, since the 1940s, has tried not to even whisper about because the consequences are so grave.

We bring shame on ourselves in so many ways. And we seem to keep finding ways to show the world that we are capable of great evil.

We claim to be a shining city on a hill. We usually have been. But that’s not what the world is seeing now. That really bothers me.

Share Button
Comments Off on Showing the World What We are Capable of

Mike Pence and the SBC: Politicians will be Politicians

Last week I followed the Southern Baptist Convention meeting. Some interesting stuff was happening, beyond the Paige Patterson controversy. Ed Stetzer wrote a great piece about it, and the Washington Post covered the convention well.

The only story you probably heard was about Vice President Mike Pence’s speech. The audience was expecting an affirmation of the SBC’s ministry and influence, but all they got was a campaign speech. Which Stetzer said shouldn’t have surprised them. “The reality is that we should expect politicians to act in political ways.” But it upset a great many people–conservative, Southern evangelicals, Trump’s base.

Pence cited all of the Trump administration’s accomplishment, such as they are, and basically exalted President Trump, as Pence usually does. One person counted up the references Pence made: President (61 times), Trump (12 times), Donald (6 times), God (9), Christ (2), Jesus (1).

After the speech, JD Greer, the new president of the Southern Baptist Convention, tweeted this:

“I know that [Pence’s speech] sent a terribly mixed signal. We are grateful for civic leaders who want to speak to our Convention—but make no mistake about it, our identity is in the gospel and our unity is in the Great Commission. Commissioned missionaries, not political platforms, are what we do.”

Good for him! The question that people were then asking was: why invite politicians? Stetzer wrote:

“We must ask ourselves, what is our goal? And who do we want to be? If the focus is evangelism, discipleship, mission, and church planting, having a Vice President come to speak doesn’t actually significantly help us with our goals. The Southern Baptist Convention is the largest denominational missions-sending organization in the world, represented in numerous countries. So how does highlighting ONE country’s leadership help us model and show diversity and inclusiveness with other countries?”

He also pointed out an irony. Two hours before the speech, the Mission board told the inspiring story of a Muslim in an undisclosed country whom a Baptist missionary had led to Christ. Then Pence bragged about how the administration had radical Muslims “on the run.”

Said Stetzer, “We should not be confused about which of those scenarios should have us cheering the most. Our ultimate desire is not to have any people on the run, but rather to have them running to Christ.”

Stetzer and he and others basically said, “Enough with inviting politicians to our convention. There’s a time and a place to talk about politics, but it’s not at our conventions that are meant to be focused on the gospel mission.”

CNN reporter Daniel Burke, who spent a couple days covering the meeting, tweeted: “They’ve spent the vast majority of that time talking about evangelism. Not politics, not the role of women, not the culture wars. Church planting and baptisms are the core focus.”

But because they invited Pence, the news coverage was dominated by politics–not the work of the Gospel. From everything I read, the Southern Baptists aren’t going to let that happen again.

Share Button
Comments Off on Mike Pence and the SBC: Politicians will be Politicians

The Immorality of Using Children as Bargaining Chips

On Friday, President Trump basically admitted, “We’ll continue traumatizing children until you give me what I want.” He then outlined what he wanted–funding his border wall and other immigration policies. He saw innocent children, crying for their mothers and fathers, as a convenient bargaining chip. He admitted it. Administration officials tried to spin his words differently, as they are regularly required to do, but the President spoke plainly enough. He told us what was in his heart.

I’d like to be outraged. But at this point, I’m just sad. Sad that this is what we’ve become.

This is not about immigration, per se. I support getting tougher to stop illegal entries. Crossing the border illegally is, well, illegal and should be treated as such. I agree with the recent decision to not permit domestic abuse as a reason for granting asylum. I agree that, with good intentions, we took in tens of thousands of foreigners as a result of natural or man-made crises–in Haiti, El Salvador, and elsewhere–but were wrong in allowing “temporary” to become “permanent.” I hadn’t realized how many such populations remained within our borders. I agree that laws should be followed.

But separating children from their parents is an elective policy. It’s not necessary. And it’s not humane. As Lindsey Graham said, the President could end it with one phone call. But he won’t stop the abuse of children until he gets what he wants. That is a sad commentary on his moral conscience, and on all of us.

Matthew 15:18-19: “But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these things defile a person. For out of the heart come evil ideas, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander.”

Share Button
Comments Off on The Immorality of Using Children as Bargaining Chips

Christian Voices on the Separation of Immigrant Families

When it comes to moral and family issues, I want to hear from people of faith. I don’t take my moral cues from pundits, government officials, or celebrities. Rachel Maddow, Sean Hannity, and all the rest have agendas apart from Scripture. They couldn’t care less about “What would Jesus do?” Unfortunately, my observation is that way too many Christians form their views from these secular sources, and don’t seek out views from the people they SHOULD be paying attention to–Christian leaders.

Although you may listen to Laura Ingraham or Chris Matthews five nights a week, I encourage you to not shape your views from their opinions. Rather, give extra weight to people who speak from a foundation of knowing and loving Jesus. THOSE are the people whose values align with my own, and I hope that matters to you, as well.

Here are Christian voices (mostly evangelical) addressing the issue of separating immigrant children from their parents.

Leith Anderson, President, National Association of Evangelicals: “The Bible says that families came first and government later. Let’s not buck the Bible by separating families.”

Franklin Graham: “It’s disgraceful, and it’s terrible to see families ripped apart, and I don’t support that one bit.”

Scott Arbeiter, President, World Relief: “I’m deeply troubled that as families fleeing persecution reach our border, children are being separated from their parents. I know that President Trump doesn’t want to separate families, either, and I pray he’ll do all he can to reverse these policies.”

Russell Moore, President, Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention: “As Christians who care deeply about protecting families and children, we reject the idea that separating children from parents is a sensible component of any immigration policy. As Christians, we affirm both the rule of law and compassion for the vulnerable. Splitting up families is not in the best interests of the United States.”

Rich Stearns, President, World Vision USA: “The single most important relationship for all children, especially those at risk of violence or in high stress situations, is that of a parent. Separating children from their parents can have a devastating long-term effect on children’s mental, physical, and emotional development.”

Tony Suarez, president of the world’s largest Hispanic evangelical association: “God have mercy on those who seem so nonchalant to the plight of children being separated from their parents.”

Cardinal Timothy Dolan: “If they want to take a baby from the arms of his mother and separate the two, that’s wrong. I don’t care where you’re at, what time and what condition….That goes against human decency.”

Statement from the Evangelical Immigration Table, which includes groups with which the United Brethren Church is associated–the National Associatipn of Evangelicals, World Relief, and the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities: “As evangelical Christians guided by the Bible, one of our core convictions is that God has established the family as the fundamental building block of society. The state should separate families only in the rarest of instances.”

Jo Anne Lyon, former general superintendent of The Wesleyan Church: “Americans are divided politically, but this issue is beyond politics. Any of us can imagine the terror that strikes a child separated from her mother or father, and the despair of a mother whose child has been taken from her. It’s vital that we respect our country’s longstanding asylum laws, that we do all we can to keep families together, and that we resume our history of welcoming refugees.”

Ed Stetzer, Wheaton College and LifeWay Research: “As Americans, but even more as followers of Jesus, we should hold the family unit in high regard. God created the family long before there were borders….Separating children from their families is not a humane way to approach immigration policy, and it does not honor the dignity and respect afforded every human as made in the image of God. Yes, there are times when children must be separated from parents, but an immigration ‘deterrent’ does not make this list by a wide margin….We don’t want to live in a nation where children are unnecessarily and casually separated from their parents as a matter of policy….This is not a hard one, sisters and brothers. Yes, immigration is a tricky issue and debatable issue, but using the separation of families as a threat and a tool is not. We can (and must) do better.”

Bishop Daniel Flores (Texas): “Separating immigrant parents and children as a supposed deterrent to immigration is a cruel and reprehensible policy. Children are not instruments of deterrence, they are children.”

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishop: “Families are the foundational element of our society and they must be able to stay together. While protecting our borders is important, we can and must do better as a government, and as a society, to find other ways to ensure that safety. Separating babies from their mothers is not the answer and is immoral.”

Cardinal Sean O’Malley (Boston): “The United States is now openly before the world using children as pawns to enforce a hostile immigration policy….I have always taught respect for the civil law and will continue to do so. But I cannot be silent when our country’s immigration policy destroys families, traumatizes parents, and terrorizes children. The harmful and unjust policy of separating children from their parents must be ended.”

Statement from 26 Jewish organizations: “Taking children away from their families is unconscionable. Such practices inflict unnecessary trauma on parents and children, many of whom have already suffered traumatic experiences. We urge you to immediately rescind the ‘zero tolerance’ policy and uphold the values of family unity and justice on which our nation was built.”

Share Button
Comments Off on Christian Voices on the Separation of Immigrant Families

Messy Justice is Still Justice

I’m not a fan of celebrity pardons. I want to see justice done in the prison system, but not restrict it to people who either know the President, know somebody who can get the President’s ear, or get on Fox & Friends to state their case during the President’s morning “executive time.” I’d prefer a more thoughtful, objective approach to pardons and commutations.

However, I care more than justice happen, regardless of the process. And in the case of Alice Johnson, whose sentence was commuted today by President Trump, justice was done. That gladdens me.

Johnson was convicted of a nonviolent, first-time drug offense, and given a ridiculous life sentence. And she has served 22 years. Such a sentence should never have happened.

So thank you, President Trump, for freeing this woman from prison. Justice was done. And thank you, Kim Kardashian, for using your influence to make it happen.

Share Button
Comments Off on Messy Justice is Still Justice

40 Years in the Same Place

My college senior picture, taken in 1978 or early 1979.

On this day 40 years ago–June 6, 1978–I started working at the United Brethren denominational headquarters. That’s a long time to come, every day, to the exact same building (though I’ve occupied four different offices). As I tell people, it’s hard to get rid of us entrenched bureaucrats. You’ve heard of “deep state.” I’m “deep church.”

It’s been a joy to spend my career serving the United Brethren Church. I was born into the United Brethren Church, and by the time I began working here, had ordered practically every item on the UB menu–camps, Bible quizzing, youth conventions, college, preacher’s kid, attending UB churches in four different states. It may sound boring to work at the same place for 40 years, but my field, communications, has continually brought new challenges, with changing technologies and accompanying learning curves.

I’ve worked with 11 different bishops, six different Missions directors, and four different Huntington University presidents. Missionaries have always been my heroes, and I’ve had the chance to get to know, and often interview, scores of missionaries. I’ve rubbed shoulders with hundreds of ministers. They come in incredible variety.

In 1978, I had just completed my junior year at Huntington College. Elsa Houtz, my favorite professor in what was then (but not now) a very weak major, Communications, had heard that the assistant editor position was coming open. She had held that position 1975-1977, then turned it over to Denny Miller when she began teaching at HC. She told me I should apply, which I did. I worked part-time during my senior year of college, then went fulltime.

I edited a Sunday school take-home paper, and worked on the monthly United Brethren magazine and our Sunday school quarterlies. In 1982 I became the editor and, for the next 12 years, focused on the monthly magazine. We transitioned to a newsletter strategy in 1993, and in 1997, the internet crashed into my world and we launched a website. Always something new to keep it interesting. Now we have a mobile app.

I used to develop film in our own darkroom. Now I use digital cameras. I went from an IBM Selectric typewriter, to an AT&T DOS computer with two 5.25” floppy disk drives (no hard drive) and a dot-matrix printer. Then, praise God for Steve Jobs. In 1987, my life changed when we got a Mac II, with a monster 40MB drive and 2MB of RAM, attached to a green-screen 12-inch monitor.

It’s been a fun ride, a perfect use of my gifts. And it’s been a pleasure.

Share Button
Comments Off on 40 Years in the Same Place

Jesus Reigns. Beyond That, Let’s Not Fuss About It.

United Brethren Bishop Jonathan Weaver, though quite a theologian, apparently didn’t like to fuss over End Times scenarios. I like what he wrote in 1870:

“I know little about what people call a millennium. Whether Christ will reign with his saints a thousand years, I cannot tell. This much I do know: that Christ is reigning, and will reign until all enemies are put under his feet.”

The United Brethren Church has never stated, “This is how the End Times will happen.” Some denominations have it all figured out, and require ministers to be pre-trib, amillennial, or something else. All we say is what the Bible makes clear: that Jesus will come again at the last day–whenever that is, and whatever it looks like–to judge the living and the dead. Some ministers who have joined us from other denominations have said it’s refreshing and liberating not to be forced into an eschatological box.

HOWEVER. We don’t live in a vacuum. “Pre-Trib” is the dominant view among evangelicals. If you ask United Brethren what they believe about the End Times, I’m sure the majority would say, “The Left Behind books–that’s basically how it will happen.”

I, like Jonathan Weaver, don’t like to fuss over the End Times. Every generation thinks Christ will come during their lifetime, and for 2000 years, every generation has been wrong. For a brief time as a teen, reading Hal Lindsey, Salem Kirban, and other authors, I was consumed with the notion that Christ’s return was imminent. I subsequently swung clear the other way, and have seen no reason to swing back.

Here’s my view of End Times scenarios, like the Left Behind books. People take Scripture passages scattered throughout the Bible (Daniel, Ezekiel, Isaiah, the Gospels, Revelation, etc.), put them in a blender, pour in a cup of whole-grain imagination, add a squirt of low-fat theology, season with current events, and serve with fear of eternal damnation and missing the rapture.

I can hold that view and still be a good United Brethren–as long as I believe that Jesus will, eventually, return. Which I do.

Share Button
Comments Off on Jesus Reigns. Beyond That, Let’s Not Fuss About It.

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives