Category Archives: Politics

Elizabeth Edwards Fights the Mommy Wars

Just read a fascinating piece called Elizabeth¬†Edwards and the Mommy Wars, on Time’s “Swampland” blog. A woman, writing on a blog, really attacked Elizabeth Edwards for spending her final days on the campaign trail instead of with her kids. I found myself thinking, “Good point, good point.”

And then came Elizabeth Edwards’ response. Phew! That lady’s articulate and thoughtful. Everything I’ve read about John and Elizabeth Edwards indicates they are really good parents with a good family. Elizabeth’s defense of herself gave some great insights into good parenting.

I like that lady.

Share Button
Comments Off on Elizabeth Edwards Fights the Mommy Wars

Gullible Conservatives

I am continually amazed by people’s gullibility, as evidenced by the emails that get forwarded to me, as if it’s information the “liberal press” doesn’t want you to know.

Today, I got one about Ollie North’s testimony in the Iran-Contra hearings, in which he talked about Osama bin Laden as a terrorist and the most evil person he knew. I remember watching his testimony. The terrorist was Abu Nidal. Back then, during the years Russia occupied Afghanistan, Osama was our friend. Ollie probably even sent him some Stinger missiles.

The email said that the senator questioning North disagreed with North’s solution–that bin Laden should be assassinated. That senator, the email said, was Al Gore. Well, Gore wasn’t part of that committee.

Then there was an email saying Mohammed Atta blew up an Israeli bus in the 1980s, was captured by the Israelis, but was released after pressure from the Clinton administration. And he then flew a plane into the Twin Towers. Well, the bomber was another guy with the same name.

Hey, my fellow conservatives: quit making stuff up. If you hate Democrats, that’s okay. But at least tell the truth.

Share Button
1 Comment

When Reconciliation Wins

It’s nice to hear marital success stories every once in a while.

There’s a couple I know, been married about 30 years. Earlier in the marriage people had suspicions that the guy was fooling around (and he probably was), but nothing went public until a fling about ten years ago. Most people thought the wife should have left him; I guess that would be the reaction in most cases. But she didn’t. They both got good counseling, and they stayed together.

I remember hearing a seminar speaker say many years ago, “Adultery is grounds for divorce. But it is also grounds for forgiveness.” In this case, the wife opted for forgiveness. Some folks are cynical about her motives, since he’s a successful guy. But how can you fault her for determining to save a marriage?

Today, by all appearances, they have a good, strong marriage. They both have a great relationship with their daughter, a really fine young woman who is becoming a successful professional. There are plenty of cynics who suspect he’ll go AWOL again–and maybe he will. But right now, I look at a marriage that has been restored, and it makes me feel good. It should make all Christians rejoice.

But because it’s Bill and Hillary Clinton, we’re not allowed to feel good about it, and certainly not commend them. Why is that?

Share Button
1 Comment

Cheney Gets Rapped by Another VP

Very interesting article in the Washington Post, Answering to No One, by Walter Mondale (Jimmy Carter’s VP). He gives a history of the role of the vice president, and then comes to Dick Cheney. His words affirm what I’ve felt for a long time.

Cheney set out to create a largely independent power center in the office of the vice president. His was an unprecedented attempt not only to shape administration policy but, alarmingly, to limit the policy options sent to the president. It is essential that a president know all the relevant facts and viable options before making decisions, yet Cheney has discarded the “honest broker” role he played as President Gerald Ford’s chief of staff….

Through his vast government experience, through the friends he had been able to place in key positions and through his considerable political skills, he has been increasingly able to determine the answers to questions put to the president – because he has been able to determine the questions….

I’ve never seen a former member of the House of Representatives demonstrate such contempt for Congress — even when it was controlled by his own party. His insistence on invoking executive privilege to block virtually every congressional request for information has been stupefying – it’s almost as if he denies the legitimacy of an equal branch of government. Nor does he exhibit much respect for public opinion, which amounts to indifference toward being held accountable by the people who elected him.

Whatever authority a vice president has is derived from the president under whom he serves. There are no powers inherent in the office; they must be delegated by the president. Somehow, not only has Cheney been given vast authority by President Bush – including, apparently, the entire intelligence portfolio – but he also pursues his own agenda. The real question is why the president allows this to happen.

Share Button
1 Comment

The Always Entertaining James Carville

Says James Carville: “Rudy Giuliani has been married more times than Mitt Romney’s been hunting.”

Of the Democratic frontrunners: “Mama needs more spice, and Obama needs more seasoning.”

Share Button
Comments Off on The Always Entertaining James Carville

11 Questions for the Candidates

You need to read “Gordon MacDonald’s 2008 Questions,” a superb list of 11 questions he would ask of presidential candidates. He begins by referencing a secretive meeting some evangelical string-pullers held at a hotel in Florida, where Dobson and Falwell types (and probably Dobson and Falwell) were determing whom to annoint as the Christian candidate. MacDonald says, if he had been invited to that meeting, these are the questions he would want answered. It’s great stuff. I’m right there with him.

Sadly, the answers to these questions that would satisfy me most likely would not come from Republicans.

Share Button
2 Comments

Piling on About George Bush

Recently I told my brother Rick, a fellow blogger, that it had been a while since I had posted an anti-Bush rant. At this point, it almost seems like piling on. Most people now realize what a hideous failure the Bush administration has been and how it has severely damaged our place in the world and destroyed any claim to moral authority. The exceptions would be people who:

  • Watch Fox News 24/7 and/or worship Rush Limbaugh.
  • Have been kept in a medically induced coma.

I continually read stories which reference blunders by the Bush administration, but it’s done in almost a so-so way, as if Bush’s incompetence is old news and there’s no sense dwelling on it. We’re just killing time now until he leaves office and someone new can try to restore some sanity to what has been a self-indulgent, arrogant romp. Things which might have disturbed me in previous years now seem ho-hum, just more (as if we need more) evidence of how severely Bush has botched up my country.

Here are four items I’ve come across recently. Nothing spectacular about any of them, alone, but when put together, along with dozens of other stories…well, historians are going to have a hey-dey.

  • It’s well-known now that disbanding the Iraqi military was a huge error which contributed heavily to the insurgency and civil war. I read this week that we also shut down all state-run industries, thereby putting tens of thousands more people out of work. Since these included fertilizer factories, farmers were affected and food production declined. Such was the arrogance of ideologues intent on turning Iraq into a free-market economy.
  • Anti-American radicals throughout the Middle East were upset when Bin Laden attacked America. Their greatest asset was Afghanistan–a country which welcomed their presence and provided a base for training. But after 9/11, nobody–including the Death to America Islamists–could blame America for invading Afghanistan. We destroyed an almost irreplaceable asset, this terrorist haven, and Al Qaeda was practically obliterated. Until we invaded Iraq. The Death to America crowd thanks Bush for invading Iraq, because in so doing, we revived a terrorist movement which had almost been vanquished. Up from the ashes of Afghanistan was born a whole new generation of anti-American terrorists. Good job, George.
  • Meanwhile, in Russia, Vladimir Putin has killed nearly all of the press freedoms which emerged from the reforms of Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and now is actively assassinating opponents and critics (13 journalists have been assassinated). The Russian parliament even passed a law permitting the assassination of Russians living abroad who were speaking out against the Russian government. But the US has no moral authority here. Not when we abduct people from one country and spirit them away to another country to be tortured–not because there’s a ticking bomb and they know the location, but because we think they know something that might, possibly, be of some value to us. Not when we give the bird to the Geneva Conventions. Not when we flagrantly disregard basic legal and privacy rights. Not when we create prisons and torture centers in other countries to get around our own laws. No, thanks to George Bush, America has no claim to moral authority. We have no business lecturing Russia, or China, or anyone else. And that is a huge, huge tragedy.
  • Iran, it turns out, was actually helping us a lot in Afghanistan and in other ways in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Many moderates and reformers in Iran wanted to normalize relations with the US. Iran even agreed to pay $500 million to help rebuild Afghanistan. But one week after that agreement, George Bush included them in his “Axis of Evil” speech. Iran’s hard-liners pronounced, “See! We told you that Iran and the US can’t be friends!” The moderates and reformers shrunk into the background, and the hard-liners took control. And now, Iran is a formidable, resolute enemy of the United States. An enemy that George Bush created.

Stories like these emerge all the time, and in the years ahead, as respected historians tackle these eight years, much more will come to light. But I’ve heard so much that nothing will surprise me. I voted for this guy twice–I trusted him–and he trashed our country’s reputation and influence.

Okay, Rick, I got this out of my system for a while.

Share Button
1 Comment

Celebrating No-Presidents Day

The third Monday in February is always Presidents Day. That means it must occur somewhere between February 15 and 21. We think of it as a combination of the birthdays of Washington and Lincoln.

But–this is interesting–their birthdays don’t fall in that span. Washington was born on either February 11 (according to the old-style Julian calendar, still being used) or February 22 (the newly-adopted Gregorian calendar). Lincoln’s birthday is February 12. Two other presidents were born in February: William Henry Harrison on February 6, and Ronald Reagan on February 9. So Presidents Day will never occur on an actual president’s birthday.

Share Button
Comments Off on Celebrating No-Presidents Day

State of the President

So, another State of the Union address tonight. The last time I watched Bush give this speech, he convinced me that Saddam Hussein was acquiring nuclear material and that an invasion of Iraq was justified. Bush knew he was at the least stretching the truth, if not outright lying. He lost my trust then, and has done nothing to regain it.

I haven’t watched a State of the Union since, and pay scant attention to any of Bush’s speeches. I’ll skip tonight’s speech, too. I’d rather go play table tennis.

Besides, he’s in “legacy preserving” mode. Which is a futile endeavor. I’ve said for a long time that Bush is the worst president of my lifetime. He’s quickly plunging toward being one of the worst presidents of all time. Fortunately, just two more years.

Share Button
2 Comments

Thoughts on Martin Luther King Day

I just came across a really great post on the Internet Monk blog called, “Five Reasons I Don’t Like MLK Day.” The author, Michael Spencer, is actually a big fan of Martin Luther King, and you see his admiration throughout the post. But he makes some really good points. For instance, he doesn’t like the fact that it’s become an African-American holiday, instead of an American holiday (after all, President’s Day isn’t a caucasian holiday).

Anyway, it’s a great post. And it’s worth sticking around for the comments, too.

My brother Rick also wrote about MLK Day on his blog.

I’ve been rather indifferent about the holiday, perhaps because I know so few African-Americans. But after seeing the “I Have a Dream” speech on Sunday at church, and after reflecting on it this week, I’ve realized how worthy this holiday is.

I’ve also tried to analyze my tangled thoughts on race. I spent my first nine years in an all-white town with a racist reputation (Huntington, Ind.). Then we moved to Pennsylvania, where Dad taught in an all-black urban school (including during the riots following King’s assassination). Meanwhile, in my suburban elementary school, we had one black student in my fourth-grade class: Keemie Hampton. I remember her name, when I can’t remember the names of any other classmates, which is interesting. She was a nice girl who acted just like all of the white girls; she just had a different skin color. I have memories of some derogatory comments guys made about her because of her skin color, but not in her presence. Still, while I don’t recall any blatant racism among my classmates, I’m sure Keemie has different memories.

Then we moved to Arizona, to a minority-free town (Lake Havasu City). And then, as I entered my junior year of high school, we settled into our first pastorate in Pixley, Calif., a multi-racial town. What an eye-opener. My first day of school, upon leaving the bus at the end of the day, I found myself surrounded by a group of blacks as one of them (a skinny guy I actually might have been able to take) tried to pick a fight with me, and all the other blacks egged us on. I managed to escape unscathed, but it certainly implanted some enduring impressions in a mind which, until then, was pretty much a blank slate when it came to racial issues.

I quickly changed buses. I still rode with blacks and hispanics and Filipinos and Portuguese and other ethnics (including white Oakies and Arkies), but I never felt threatened again.

We had a full-court basketball court in back of the parsonage, and I regularly played with local blacks and Hispanics. Race was never an issue in those games; ability was what mattered, and I could hold my own just fine. Plus, they appreciated that we let them use the court, and they were generally respectful of our property.

Our church had a team in the summer basketball park league. One night I seriously outplayed Duane, partly because he was half-drunk (I could clearly smell the wine as he tried to guard me), and he took offense. After the game, he came at me with a crowbar, and none of my church friends were around. I looked to Duane’s brother, Alvin, for help (we played on the high school team together), but he just looked away, and I knew I was on my own against a bigger, stronger guy who was going psycho. I still don’t know what kept Duane from swinging the crowbar before I got in the Toyota and drove away. It scared the daylights out of me.

After two years in that town, I carried away a lot of negative thoughts regarding people of other races–not racist thoughts, per se (I’ve never considered myself racist), but some definite baggage. Maybe some of those “first impressions” are still with me. These thoughts have been on my mind this week.

But despite all of that, I can admire the necessary, late-coming changes which occurred in America as a result of Martin Luther King’s incredible leadership.

Share Button
Comments Off on Thoughts on Martin Luther King Day

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives