Category Archives: Politics

Thoughts on the Debate

The first presidential debate confirmed (to me) my sense that we have two good candidates. Very different candidates, indeed. But both would make good presidents. I can’t say that one person won and the other lost. Both did well.

Let’s make that three good candidates.

NBC talked to Joe Biden. But though they invited Sarah Palin to appear, the campaign said, “No, you can’t talk to her, but we’ll let you talk to Rudi Guiliani.” Hmmmm. Their confidence in Palin overwhelms me. They are hyper-protective and controlling of her. The Obama campaign has no such lack of confidence in Joe Biden. Will Palin turn out to have been just a…tactic?

Some other thoughts from the debate:

  • Jim: Obama and McCain really don’t want to talk directly to each other. Let it go.
  • Obama was overly defensive, wanting to correct McCain’s statements way too often. Chill, dude.
  • McCain’s demeanor turned me off.
  • Barack: Yes, we know about that speech you gave long ago opposing the war. It only shows that you got one right. Doesn’t mean you’ll get them all right.
  • Did either one ever actually answer a Jim Lehrer question?
  • I’m totally with Obama about talking to Iran and others. It’s the biblical approach: when you have problems with someone, go talk to them. McCain’s harping about preconditions seemed empty.
  • McCain’s experience came through strongly. Several times, he said, “I know how to…whatever,” and he does.
  • And yet, on a range of key issues, I prefer Obama’s view of things, even though it’s built on a foundation of relative inexperience.
  • David Gregory did great anchoring for MSNBC. Fair and balanced.
  • Watched a few minutes of Olberman’s “special.” Couldn’t take it.
  • Babylon 5 fans: Doesn’t Mike Murphy’s hair remind you of a M’nbari?
Share Button
Comments Off on Thoughts on the Debate

Quote Unquote

Ed Rollins: “[Obama] is not going to win by telling voters McCain is too old and doesn’t know how to use the Internet. Many of McCain’s supporters are old and could care less about the Internet.”

Share Button
Comments Off on Quote Unquote

Going Easy on Palin

For me, Charles Gibson’s interview of Sarah Palin was disappointing. She came across about how I expected–straightforward and earnest, but shallow on the issues. My big disappointment was with Gibson.

He didn’t press her on anything, except for that stupid Bush Doctrine question (which I’ll bet Bush himself would have flunked). He just put questions out there, and accepted her rehearsed answer without prying further. I suspect that Palin herself felt like she got off easy.

  • She’s been misleading the country about her support for the Bridge to Nowhere, but Gibson passively accepted her canned answer.
  • He brought up, but didn’t push, on her record with other earmarks.
  • He let her get away with her totally unnecessary lie about selling that government jet on eBay.
  • He didn’t pry into what, to me, sure looks like abuse of power in Troopergate.
  • He didn’t bring up her, and her husband’s, association with the Alaskan separatist party, and that party’s affiliation with the American Constitution Party, which seeks a US theocracy (can you spell T-A-L-I-B-A-N?). I don’t care how hard-core Republican you are–shouldn’t this be explored?
  • Religious statements she has made, like describing the Iraq war as “a task that is from God,” and that building a new gas line was God’s will.

I like Palin. But while I would love to perpetuate the image of Sarah Palin as squeaky-clean wholesome, there remains room for much legitimate press inquiry. She needs to be held accountable for misrepresenting her own record. I expected more from Charlie.

Palin’s next interview is with Sean Hannity on Tuesday. That’ll be a joke. Like Olberman interviewing Obama. Hannity will mostly just set her up to criticize Obama. At some point, Palin needs to be pressed.

Share Button
1 Comment

200 Channels, and No News

At the Y, a long bank of TVs hang on the wall to help fitnessnics while away the time on the treadmills, bikes, and arc trainers. My arm-bound Radio Shack tuner lets me dial into the various channels.

So I’m treadmilling last night, switching back and forth between MSNBC and FOXNews. And getting very frustrated. Lots of very serious analysis of lipstick comments. Olberman is bashing McCain and giving Democrats highly articulate wet kisses. Meanwhile, O’Reilly is pretending to be fair and balanced while belittling all things Democrat.

Olberman is now officially a joke (there, Mom, I said it), his own Worst Person in the World. (O’Reilly has been one for some time.) His Alpha Dog power trip downed Tucker Carlson and Dan Abrams, and he’s working on banishing Tom Brokaw, who told him on air that he was being unfair.

Their shows end. On comes newcomer Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, and Hannity and Colmes on Fox. Maddow is Olberman’s spunky little sister. Hannity loves superlatives and exaggerations, like last night when he said of McCain, “He had every bone in his body broken in a Hanoi prison.” Colmes is allowed to speak occasionally.

I just want to watch some objective news. A couple nights ago, Olberman interviewed Obama, with questions akin to this: “You’ve seen the latest McCain ad. It was stupid, right?” I think even Obama was embarrassed by it, and may have thought Olberman was hitting on him, it was so suck-uppity chummy.

I went home and turned on CNN. Anderson Cooper was actually dealing with issues–comparisons of the candidates’ tax plans, their abortion views, other stuff. It was enlightening. What a concept.

I miss having Headline News at night, when you could actually turn on the TV and get the day’s news. Now, Headline News has Shallow Glen and Shamelessly Exploitive Nancy…and better ratings, evidently. So sad.

Share Button
Comments Off on 200 Channels, and No News

The Decline of Journalism

I’m a trained journalist. I used to regularly read Washington Journalist Review and Columbia Journalism Review. I’m an admirer of old-school journalists, and I appreciate their mindset. You put aside your own biases and follow the story, wherever it leads. No matter what the partisan spinmeisters say, writing a negative story about the Clintons doesn’t make you a Republican, and writing something negative about McCain doesn’t mean you’re a Democrat. Journalists follow the story.

I loved David Brinkley’s Sunday morning show. Brinkley was a hardcore journalist; so were Cokie Roberts and the ever-unlovable Sam Donaldson. George Will, a pundit, was thrown in for good measure.

But today, pundits rule. The people who host TV “news” shows don’t come from journalism backgrounds. Olberman, Matthews, O’Reilly, Stephanopolous, Scarborough, Buchanan, Carlson, Abrams, Larry King–these are not journalists. They are personalities. And so, news circa 2008 is far different from news circa 1978.

There are still some true journalists out there. Jim Lehrer, Tom Brokaw, Andrea Mitchell, Bob Scheiffer, David Gregory (though he’s aspiring to be a pundit), Brian Williams, Christiane Amanpour, Bob Woodward, Candy Crowley, Anderson Cooper (yes, Cooper). Dan Rather was an amazing journalist in his day. The major newspapers are home to many superb journalists.

But TV viewers want opinions, evidently, not facts. So personalities rise to the top at the expense of journalists.

And today, there’s the dilemma of deciding, “Who is a journalist?” The evil “media” now includes the blogosphere, where facts are optional. And so, Andrea Mitchell and Bob Woodward get lumped in with DailyKos and HuffingtonPost. They are not the same. But the blogs get half-baked stories out there, and journalists really have no choice but to follow up to see if there’s any truth to it. Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity vomit up innuendoes and tabloid-worthy gossip about Democrats, and when Brian Williams doesn’t repeat it on Nightly News, he gets accused of being on the Democrat payroll. No, it’s just that they didn’t find anything credible to report.

But unfortunately, the half-truths and thoroughly-spun tripe from the pundits and blogs is what we end up talking about.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Decline of Journalism

Now I Can Get Some Sleep

Regrettably, I fell asleep halfway through McCain’s speech last night. When I woke up, he had just finished. Time for balloons. Poor Andrea Mitchell, drowned in balloons. She was trying to come up with something clever, like when John Chancellor said while being carried off by security at the 1964 convention, “This is John Chancellor, somewhere in custody.” Andrea said she was somewhere on the convention floor, and I’m sure she had Chancellor in mind, but she just couldn’t think of something clever.

So, my long bout of sleeplessness will come to an end.

  • Two weeks of Olympics.
  • A week of the Democratic convention.
  • Then the Republican convention.

Now, finally, there’s no reason to stay awake past 10:00.

I guess McCain knew I needed the sleep, so he let me get started early.

Share Button
Comments Off on Now I Can Get Some Sleep

Wasilla – A Big Small Town

Laugh if you want about Sarah Palin being mayor of a little town like Wasilla. Truth is, Wasilla is the fourth-largest city in Alaska. And it’s growing. Used to be ninth.

If Palin were mayor of the fourth-largest city in Indiana, she’d be living in South Bend and rooting for the Fighting Irish.

With 9780 people, Wasilla is roughly the size of Decatur, Ind. So there.

Share Button
Comments Off on Wasilla – A Big Small Town

Sarah Palin: Gotta Love Her!

Sarah Palin rocked. Her family rocked. Excellent pick, Mr. McCain. The news this morning, various channels, replayed her best lines–and there were a lot of them. When she was selected, the conventional wisdom was that McCain had just forfeited his greatest argument against Obama–that he was inexperienced. But Palin’s executive experience–though minimal–only accentuates Obama’s pervasive novice-ness.

A few other notes:

  • Rudy was superb. He killed Obama on the experience issue. Gave me extensive pause.
  • Did you know that John McCain was a POW? Someone pointed that out last night.
  • I watched the first 45 minutes of Morning Joe this a.m. A ravefest for Palin.
  • I remain concerned that the McCain campaign is headed toward the contemptible “divide the country so we can win the election” tactics of George Bush.
  • The constant “USA!” chanting really gets on my nerves.
  • Mitt Romney: boring! He said something about Republicans not being the party of Big Brother. ‘Scuse me, but–warrantless wire-tapping of American citizens? Curbing of civil rights?
  • I didn’t like the campaign people constantly portraying Palin as a victim of the press. As if she was sequestered in a hotel room, barely holding back tears, muttering, “Everyone’s picking on me. Please tell them to s-t-o-o-o-o-o-p.” She’s a tough gal. I can’t imagine she enjoys being depicted as a victim.
Share Button
Comments Off on Sarah Palin: Gotta Love Her!

Olberman: Funny Guy

Mike Huckabee said that Sarah Palin got more votes for mayor than Joe Biden got for President. It was a joke. But soon as the speech ended, Keith Olberman felt compelled to offer a correction–that Joe Biden got far more votes than that. He wondered where Huckabee got his information. Keith: it was a joke. Chill, dude.

MSNBC put Keith Olberman and Chris Matthews in different rooms. Good idea.

Share Button
Comments Off on Olberman: Funny Guy

Sarah Palin

I like Sarah Palin. A lot. She’ll come under fire for lack of experience and gravitas (could she go toe-to-toe with Putin?), but I think she’ll do fine. She’s good people, and pretty spunky from the sounds of it.

Four good candidates. For me, it’s a win-win election. I have definite views about what the country needs right now and where we need to go. For that, I lean rather strongly toward Obama. I have concerns about him, but more concerns about McCain and areas in which his views don’t represent where I feel we need to go. If we hadn’t just undergone eight years of George Bush’s wrecking ball, with debris scattered everywhere, I would easily vote for McCain.

But they’re both good men. To me, there’s no need to demonize any of the four candidates, and I hope (with little real hope) that this campaign can stay civil. They’re all good people, and I’ll probably be happy whichever way it goes. (Cindy McCain would make the best First Lady.)

Two months to go. Lots could happen. One of the biggest McCain negatives, for me, is that he’s using a Karl Rove disciple to run his campaign, and we’re seeing Rovish tactics. This turns my stomach, and I hate seeing McCain diminish himself this way. If Obama bows to similar tactics, I’ll be similarly disappointed.

But right now, I want to, for the most part, rejoice knowing that whoever wins, the country will be better off.

Share Button
Comments Off on Sarah Palin

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives