Category Archives: Movies

Movie: The One Percent (Documentary)

“The One Percent” is about the richest of the rich in America, the 1% of people who control over half of the country’s wealth, and who keep getting richer and richer, helped along by friendly legislators and tax codes. It’s about the gap that exists between everyday Americans and the ultra-rich.

At the beginning of the movie, the young filmmaker is getting ready to crash a high-class croquet game at some country club. I figured this would be a Michael Moore kind of movie, with the documentarian squirming his way into places where he doesn’t belong.

But then we find out–Jamie Johnson, the filmmaker, DOES belong at that croquet club. He’s an heir to the Johnson & Johnson fortune, a grandson of the founder. Which makes it all the more interesting. But it’s a different movie than what I thought it would be.

Johnson spotlights the gap between the ultra-rich and the poor. But only for a bit. The film is more about rich guilt, perhaps his own guilt at being born wealthy.

Johnson interviews some high-powered people: Milton Friedman, Bill Gates Sr., Steve Forbes, Adnan Khashoggi, and other wealthy men. It’s fascinating to hear them reflect on their wealth, and to bare some uncomfortable feelings about it.

But the most interesting interviews are with two children of privilege who have chosen an ordinary life: Nicole Buffet, a granddaughter of Warren Buffet; and a grandson of Oscar Meyer.

Jamie Johnson

Nicole Buffet works as a nanny for a rich family in California–a family which no doubt has far less wealth than the Buffets. She’s also a wannabe artist, and she lives a very normal life. The movie cemented that: by appearing in the movie, Warren Buffet disowned her, totally cut her out of his life. It’s really a sad commentary on Buffet, a man she loves and admires.

The grandson of Oscar Meyer (I can’t remember his name) is even more interesting. He, too, lives an ordinary, middle-class life. When it came time to inherit his fortune, he told his father that he was going to give it all away. He didn’t want it. This is a guy who seemed so grounded, and articulate, that I would love to spend time talking to him.

Johnson also interviews his father, sometimes in the company of their longtime financial advisor (who STRONGLY opposed the movie). His parents are both against their son doing this movie. At the least, they would prefer to be left out of the movie. And yet, they seem like very good people, likable folks, unpretentious. They wanted to be supportive of their son, yet valued the privacy he was intent on invading.

Jamie Johnson's father

There is a great backstory. Jamie Johnson’s father once made a documentary himself, about hunger in South Africa during the apartheid days. The Johnson & Johnson company was mentioned in the film. He got raked over the coals by the company, and the scars of that experience clearly linger. At one time, he was an idealistic young filmmaker; now he lives the life of a wealthy heir.

Toward the end, the father finally agrees to talk on camera with his son, who then asks him what happened years ago with the film he made. He begins telling the story, and just as it’s getting very very interesting, he quits. He doesn’t want to say more. Why? It’s hard to tell, and we’re left with no answers.

This is not the movie I was expecting, a movie about the rich-poor gap. It was somewhat about that, but much more about rich guilt. About the ambivalence some rich people feel about their wealth. It’s not a great movie by any means; I found Jamie Johnson to be a terrible interviewer. I think it was as much about his own rich guilt as anything, and I wonder if his idealism resulted in anything beyond this movie, or was just a fleeting thing.

Share Button
2 Comments

Movie: True Grit (2010)

Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Daniels) and Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld) in the 2010 version of "True Grit."

Pam and I saw “True Grit” this afternoon. I love westerns, and always try to see them on the big screen. That’s the only way to do a western justice.

The 1969 John Wayne version, of course, is a classic. He won “Best Actor” for his portrayal of Rooster Cogburn. When I heard that Jeff Bridges was playing that role in the 2010 remake, I thought, “What?!?” It just didn’t strike me right. But let me tell you: Bridges was superb! It was a very, very different Rooster, but an incredible performance. Or so I thought.

The two versions of Mattie Ross: Hailee Steinfeld (left) and Kim Darby.

But the real star was Hailee Steinfeld, playing the Mattie Ross role. Kim Darby played that role as a young adult woman, or at least that’s how I remember it. In the 2010 remake, as in the book, Mattie Ross is a 14-year-old girl. And whereas Kim Darby’s Mattie was cute, Hailee’s version is plain.

The movie begins by focusing the first 15 minutes or so on Mattie Ross, cementing in our minds that the movie is about her, not about Rooster Cogburn. In those early scenes, I developed a real fondness for the Mattie Ross character, who is bright, spunky, fearless, and mature beyond her years.

Jeff Daniels as a very different Rooster Cogburn.

Glenn Campbell played the Texas Ranger LaBoeuf in the original. It wasn’t a standout performance, but a good one. Likewise for Matt Damon’s work in the remake. Nothing special about it.

Robert Duvall played Ned Pepper in 1969. Barry Pepper, best known as the sniper in “Saving Private Ryan,” played him in the remake. You could hardly see Pepper in the character. He gave a different take on the classic line, “I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man”–same words, but different delivery. I think I like the way Duvall did it better, but both were good.

Both versions played the shootout scene almost exactly the same way.

The remake, from what I understand, is much more faithful to the book, especially in  revolving around Mattie Ross. Much dialogue is taken verbatim from the book. That’s pretty obvious, because the wording and phrasing is by no means contemporary, as was the dialogue in the 1969 version. The dialogue is very foreign to the way we talk today.

The story is roughly the same. You see Mattie Ross recruiting Rooster to pursue the man who killed her father. The scene at the cabin by the river is very similar (yet different). There’s the open-plain charge by Rooster against Ned Pepper’s gang–Rooster taking the reigns in his teeth and firing with both pistols, with similar results. There’s Mattie’s fall into the snakepit, and the mad dash to get her treated. So many similarities.

And yet, there are scenes that don’t appear in the original, and new takes. They travel through snow, for instance. And the epilogue is new.

I really liked this movie. I knew I would, but it’s different than what I expected. Especially considering that the Coen Brothers made the movie. These are the guys who made Raising Arizona, Fargo, O Brother Where Art Thou, No Country for Old Men, and other movies with serious quirks. But here, with True Grit, they played it straight. And that was the right choice.

Share Button
1 Comment

Documentary: Food Inc.

food-inc-500.jpg

I highly recommend this 2008 documentary. It looks at how aspects of the food industry  control what we eat with little concern for its affect on our health or the humane treatment of animals. The film touches on big monopolistic companies like Tyson and Monsanto, examines the world of organic farming, gives glimpses into factory farming, and shows how big food companies carry the same political cloud as the oil, gun, and other lobbies.

This is a documentary where you learn a lot. Here are some things I gleaned:

  • We re-engineered the chicken to grow in 49 days, instead of 70.
    They now have very large breasts, because people prefer white meat.
  • The
    hamburger you buy in the store may come from hundreds of different cows
    slaughtered on factory farms, and there’s a chance that one of those
    cows had e coli. This scary argument is presented very convincingly.
  • In both Republican and Democratic administrations, key position
    involved with food regulation and policy are filled by people who once
    worked for the food industry–lobbyists, corporate board members,
    lawyers, etc. You won’t find ordinary farmers in any position of
    influence.
  • Why can you get a hamburger for a dollar, but you can’ get a head of broccoli for a dollar? It’s because we’ve skewed what we subsidize to the bad calories.
  • From an evolutionary standpoint, our bodies are not wired for sugar, salt, and fat. But those dominate our diets.
  • God designed cows to eat grass. That’s how their digestive system works best. But most of the beef we buy is corn-fed. The goal is to bulk up cattle quickly. But for corn-fed cattle, you must grow the corn, transport it, then remove the manure–all of which are not environmentally friendly practices. Grass-fed cows, by comparison, graze on the grass and their manure fertilizes it. It’s a complete system in one field, and it saves on gas and transportation costs.
  • Most Mexican farmers grew corn. NAFTA flooded Mexico with cheap American corn, and put 1.5 million Mexican farmers out of work.
  • The film blasts Monsanto to pieces. Monsanto basically owns everything involving soybeans because they patented a gene in the soybean. Farmers can’t fight them. Monsanto has a big team of investigators who go after farmers in court.
  • Wal-Mart was commended for some of their practices and their embrace of organic foods.
  • The food industry fights any kind of food labeling requirements. They don’t want you to know what’s in your food, how it was grown, and where.
  • The film suggests that the battle against tobacco is the model for how an industry’s irresponsible behavior can be changed.
  • Companies that don’t treat animals with respect probably don’t treat workers and the environment–and customers–with respect.
  • Buy locally grown food. It doesn’t need to be transported long distances (more eco-friendly), and it probably doesn’t come from factory farms, where animals are warehoused in squalid conditions until they are ready for slaughter. 
Share Button
Comments Off on Documentary: Food Inc.

Movies We’ve Been Watching

4-movies-475.jpgHere are some movies Pam and I have watched recently on DVD. Haven’t been to a theater all year…yet.

  • “Law Abiding Citizen,” with Gerard Butler (of “300” fame), was a lot better than I expected. Butler’s wife and daughter are brutally killed in a home invasion, and he later exacts horrific revenge. That’s not giving anything away. The rest of the movie is a cat-and-mouse game with police, and it all comes to a surprising conclusion.
  • “Twilight: New Moon” is the second movie of the Twilight series. Pam and I liked the first movie, and we liked this one just as well. Vampires dominated the first movie; now we have werewolves. The movies are well-done, and have a definite tone to them. They are not high-action movies, but romances with a, uh, bite.
  • We also watched all six of the Jesse Stone TV movies, starring Tom Selleck–5 on DVD, and the latest this past Sunday night on CBS. These are based on the books by Robert Parker. Parker started this series around 1998. We loved these movies. If you watch a movie and then read a Jesse Stone book, you can picture Selleck in every scene and saying every line. He plays Jesse Stone perfectly. Like the Twilight movies, they have a slow-paced, smalltown mood.
  • Having watched the Jesse Stone movies, we decided to try the Spenser movies made in the 1980s. “Ceremony” is the first one. I liked Robert Urich in the title role, was okay with Avery Brooks as Hawk, but didn’t like the gal who played Susan. She just wasn’t Susan. I didn’t particularly care for this movie, and it had a lot of gratuitous nudity. But we’ll try another one.
  • “All About Steve” is a Sandra Bullock movie, and who doesn’t like Sandra Bullock? In this movie, she plays a very quirky character who pretty much stalks a guy. It’s a fun, light-weight movie.
  • Finally, “Blindside,” the movie which won Sandra Bullock an Oscar. This was a great story, an inspiring story. This family took a huge step in adopting a basically homeless young black man into their family…but they changed his life. Now I know why everyone has raved about this film.
Share Button
Comments Off on Movies We’ve Been Watching

The Hurt Locker Vs. Avatar

hurtlocker-avatar250.jpgI don’t have a lot of opinions about the Oscar results, but I was definitely interested in the competition between Avatar and The Hurt Locker, which are the only two contending films I saw.

Some people may draw comparisons to the year when Shakespeare in Love beat out Saving Private Ryan for Best Picture. I never saw Shakespeare in Love, and it seems to have been forgotten, but Saving Private Ryan will always remain as one of the best war movies ever.

The Hurt Locker was a small movie, compared to Avatar. But I’m totally okay with it winning Best Picture. It was a truly memorable movie.

A number of scenes from The Hurt Locker are etched in my memory:

  • The creepy Iraqi with the videocamera filming while they were trying to defuse a car bomb.
  • The sniper scene out in the desert.
  • The attempt to defuse the bomb padlocked around a guy.
  • Jeremy Renner’s character standing in a street and pulling up a whole circle of bombs, with a creepy (I’ve used that word again) man of uncertain motives watching through a window and finally slinking away.

I tell people I felt dusty after watching the movie. I’ve not been to Iraq, but I felt like I was there.

hurtlockerproducer250.jpg(Speaking of creepy: what’s with that Hurt Locker producer jerking Kathryn Bigelow around by her arm? A ground-breaking moment for women, in that a woman wins Best Director, but you see this guy directing her around like she’s a child.)

Then there’s the Avatar juggernaut, biggest blockbuster in history. It didn’t affect me emotionally like The Hurt Locker, but the innovation was, ahem, out of this world. I’m sure it broke new ground in movie-making. I can’t come within lightyears of comprehending James Cameron’s vision and thought processes for that movie. Avatar was truly a masterwork of directing.

So here’s what I would like to have seen:

  • Give Best Picture to The Hurt Locker.
  • Give Best Director to James Cameron.
Share Button
Comments Off on The Hurt Locker Vs. Avatar

A Three-Movie Weekend

Thanks to tax season, Pam and I haven’t seen a movie all year. But now, since her emancipation on Wednesday, we’ve seen three movies.

  • Taken. This Liam Neeson film came out in January and is still hanging around. A really good thriller. Saw it Friday.
  • State of Play. This one came out on Friday, with Russell Crowe and Ben Afflect and one of those young actresses I can’t remember. Another really good thriller. It’s set in a journalism context (Crowe is a reporter). I like that stuff. Saw it Saturday.
  • Facing the Giants. Saw this tonight at Anchor’s movie night. I’d heard it was really good, and wasn’t disappointed. A football movie that makes you teary-eyed. It shouldn’t be.
Share Button
Comments Off on A Three-Movie Weekend

Frodo in Peril

LOTRGraph.jpg

This is good, another gem from GraphJam.com. I hadn’t thought about how often Frodo was on the verge. But we’ve got:

  • Almost gets caught by Nazgul beside that dock.
  • Stabbed on Weathertop by the Nazgul.
  • The wild ride with Arwyn to Rivendell.
  • Caught by lake monster outside Moria.
  • Stabbed by the cave troll.
  • Falls into the Dead Marshes.
  • Almost caught outside Minas Morgul (saved by magic cloak).
  • Faces down a Nazgul at Osgiliath.
  • Bitten by Shelob.
  • Attacked by Gollum outside Mount Doom.
  • The cliffhanger inside Mount Doom, after losing finger.
  • In danger from lava flows.

What am I missing?

Share Button
Comments Off on Frodo in Peril

Potty Mouth TV

I was delighted to come across the movie “All the President’s Men” last night on TCM (Turner Classic Movies). That’s a fabulous movie. I sorta came of age during Watergate, and have read a number of books about the scandal, so it has particular interest to me. Plus, being a trained journalist, I’m fascinated by the inner workings of this historic case of investigative journalism.

I was not so delighted that the airing included all of the profanity, including a number of F bombs. A sign of what’s to come throughout the TV spectrum, I suspect.

Share Button
Comments Off on Potty Mouth TV

The Joker’s Deleted Scenes

When “The Dark Knight” hits DVD, I’ll bet sales are amazing. It’ll contain “previously unseen footage of Heath Ledger’s last performance.” Stuff that didn’t make it into the theatrical release. And a few years down the road, there’ll come a director’s cut with even more deleted Joker scenes. Yes, they can milk this a long way. But would Hollywood do that? You betcha.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Joker’s Deleted Scenes

Movie: Mama Mia

While everyone else was going to see “The Dark Knight,” Pam and I saw “Mama Mia,” the musical based entirely on Abba songs. I was a huge Abba fan (particularly of Agnetha–hey, I was a college student), back when they were the biggest band in the world. “Take a Chance on Me” and “Dancing Queen” were my favorites, and both appeared in the movie. However, I didn’t recognize several songs.

I suspect “Mama Mia” will do great, particularly with us folks in the older demographics who remember Abba. It was not as good a musical as “Hairspray,” and certainly not as good as “Phantom of the Opera.” But it was very enjoyable–fun, funny, tear-jerking in places, a happy ending.

Two observations:

  • Mery Streep can really sing.
  • Pierce Brosnan can’t, but gets an A for effort.

I think the movie could have done just as well without Brosnan, but I imagine they were going for star-power equal to Streep. Hey, it worked out, and I did kinda enjoy the final song he did.

Anyway, go see it. You’ll enjoy it. And you’ll be humming Abba songs the rest of the day.

Share Button
2 Comments

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives