Category Archives: Books

Kurt Wallander and Jack Reacher

Since I was on vacation last week, I decided to tackle two 400+ page novels.

  • Sidetracked, by Henning Mankell. This is the fourth Kurt Wallander mystery. mankell_child_200.jpgI can’t say they keep getting better, because the third book in the series, The White Lioness, was my favorite thus far. But this ranks second, and kept me captivated. The novels are set in Sweden (Mankell is Swedish, and the books are translated from Swedish). I love the way national boundaries mean little, and are easily crossed, in Europe.
  • Echo Burning, by Lee Child. Robert Parker’s PI, Spenser, is the ultimate tough guy. But I’d read that Lee Child’s creation, Jack Reacher, might be tougher. I’ll need to read more Lee Child books before rendering a verdict. But I found Jack Reacher to be a very unique fellow, and Echo Burning kept me glued to the page. I didn’t like the way Reacher figured everything out, using clues not available to the reader (my same criticism of Chandler novels). But I’ll definitely read more tales about Jack Reacher.
Share Button
Comments Off on Kurt Wallander and Jack Reacher

Obscure Lessons from a Bird That Couldn’t Wait

I’m still searching for the spiritual application. So help me out.

I’m taking the week off, staying at home. I’ve just finished taking a shower, and now I’m sitting in our screened-in porch reading a good Christian book, Confessions of a Pastor, by Craig Groeschel. I’ve just finished his excellent chapter “I Feel Inadequate,” and now I’ve started the chapter “I Stink at Handling Criticism.” As I read, I keep an eye on Jordi, who is out in the grass.

After reading a couple pages, I look up–and no Jordi. He probably went around the side of the house. I stand up, pressing my face to the screen to peer around the corner. Just then a bird flies overhead. And also just then, my head is splattered with something wet but not terribly cold. Bullseye.

Bird poop. Wonderful.

The screen shows six splotches, close together. Direct hit. That bird should train F-117 pilots.

I go inside and wash myself off. And then, already being in a spiritual frame of mind, begin pondering the meaning of it all.

Since I was reading about handling criticism, was God telling me how people blame him for everything? Even an accidental bath from above? On the other hand, if this was an intentional lesson…then God IS to blame.

Or maybe it’s the “stink” part of Groeschel’s chapter. Criticism stinks, and handling criticism badly stinks. Is that a lesson God would go out of his way to make? Seems pretty shallow to me.

No, it must be something else. Something more than a euphemistic Stuff Happens. I’ll continue meditating on this throughout the day.

Share Button
1 Comment

Recent Fiction Reads

Polished off a couple of quick fiction reads recently: “Million Dollar Baby” by Robert Parker, and “Grifter’s Game,” by Lawrence Block. But since I’m taking all next week off, I started a big fat fiction book: “Sidetracked,” a Kurt Wallander mystery by Henning Mankell. My fourth book by him. Forty pages in, I’m hooked. This will be another intricate winner.

Share Button
Comments Off on Recent Fiction Reads

Leaping to Conclusions about Swedish Detective Novels

swedishbooks_190.jpgI’ve read books by two different Swedish authors. Three books by Henning Mankell, whose protagonist is police detective Kurt Wallander. And two books by Maj Sjorrel about detective Martin Beck. Mankell is the better and more prolific writer. His book White Lioness, in particular, was amazing, with two different investigations, and two sets of fully-developed characters, occurring simultaneously in different countries (Sweden and South Africa). It was a fascinating read, watching the two investigations intersect. But I like Martin Beck a lot, too.

The thing that strikes me as interesting is that neither detective is the maverick figure that you typically find in American detective novels. No Sam Spade, Philip Marlowe, Spencer, Mike Shayne, or Lew Archer. Of course, those are private detectives, while Wallander and Beck are police detectives, so perhaps a better analogy would be Alex Cross from the James Patterson novels, or Lucas Davenport from the John Sandford “prey” novels. In that case, the resemblance is closer. And yet, those Swedish detectives tend to be real team players, and you see the rest of the team actually advancing the case, whereas if anything happens in a Patterson novel, it comes from the initiative of Alex Cross. And Davenport, come to think of it, pushes the envelope constantly. The Swedish detectives have no trouble sharing the spotlight, and often significant things happen without their presence whatsoever.

I guess Americans like larger-than-life rogue heroes, while the Swedes are okay with non-heroic, team-playing plodders. In a country of socialism, a politically neutral country that avoids conflict, I guess that’s understandable. As compared to the cowboy rugged individualism of American society. It’s just something I’ve enjoyed musing about.

Share Button
Comments Off on Leaping to Conclusions about Swedish Detective Novels

Spade, Marlowe, Archer, and Spencer

3books.jpgI love the old-time, private detective pulp novels, and so I’m going to bore you with amateur drivel about the most famous ones. Please don’t humor me. Just go away and come back tomorrow, unless you envision the possibility of appreciating my shallow insights. I shall seek to sound officious, but don’t be fooled.

I just finished these detective novels, in this order:

  • The Way Some People Die, one of Ross MacDonald’s 18 Lew Archer novels.
  • Trouble is My Business, a quartet of stories by Raymond Chandler starring P.I. Philip Marlowe.
  • The Maltese Falcon, Dashiell Hammett’s only Sam Spade novel.

The contemporary and highly prolific Robert Parker, with his private investigator Spencer, is usually considered the heir to Raymond Chandler. I’ve read all but the latest Spencer novel (it sits on my shelf, a certain swell read). Chandler, in turn, is regarded as the heir to Dashiell Hammett. Usually getting left out is Ross MacDonald, who came after Chandler and whom Robert Parker adores. MacDonald, rightfully, is Chandler’s heir.

Philip Marlowe appears in nine books, while Same Spade appears only in The Maltese Falcon, plus a few short stories. Humphrey Bogart played Marlowe in “The Big Sleep” and Spade in “The Maltese Falcon.” If I remember right, he played them pretty much the same, which isn’t true to the books. Lew Archer and Philip Marlowe could be twins–smart-alecky, resourceful, contantly vexing the cops. But Spade is different: a strong-built fellow, blonde, quiet, mysterious, an explosive mean streak. Humorless. I absolutely loved The Maltese Falcon. Just wish Hammett had written as much about Spade as he did the unnamed Continental Op (another detective whom I really like, but alas, whom Bogart never portrayed).

Chandler writes with extraordinary wit, and every few pages comes a turn of phrase so clever and unique, you want to call someone up and say, “You’ve got to read this!” You want to write it down so you’ll never forget it, show it to your wife, post it on your blog. There are whole websites devoted to Chandlerisms. Gems like these:

  • “I guess God made Boston on a wet Sunday.”
  • “From thirty feet away she looked like a lot of class.¬† From ten feet away she looked like something made up to be seen from thirty feet away.”
  • “He looked as inconspicuous as a tarantula on a slice of angel food.”
  • “She jerked away from me like a startled fawn might, if I had a startled fawn and it jerked away from me.”
  • “The streets were dark with something more than night.”
  • “The minutes went by on tiptoe, with their fingers to their lips.”
  • “I’m an occasional drinker, the kind of guy who goes out for a beer and wakes up in Singapore with a full beard.”
  • “Dead men are heavier than broken hearts.”
  • “It was a blonde. A blonde to make a bishop kick a hole in a stained glass window.”
  • “The corridor which led to it had a smell of old carpet and furniture oil and the drab anonymity of a thousand shabby lives.”

A Chandler book deserves to be savored. Four Chandler novels remain on my shelf, unread, patiently awaiting their chance to delight me as much as the other five books. And yet, there’s something about MacDonald’s books that I almost prefer. Lew Archer brings practically nothing new to the genre, a rough clone of Marlowe. But the plots seem easier to follow than in Chandler and Hammett. Very accessible, and always fun. Often, his phrasing recalls Chandler.

But Parker is tops. In Spencer, he reinvented the private detective. Not only as a very tough guy, much tougher than Spade, but with an extraodinarily tough sidekick, Hawk. Plus a girlfriend, Susan, and a relationship that evolves over the course of the 30-some novels. A P.I. with an intellectual streak who likes to cook, and can sum up an entire personality by citing three characteristics. Spade, Marlowe, and Archer come from the same DNA, the stock that Hammett invented. But Spencer is a first. As was, for that matter, Sam Spade.

Share Button
1 Comment

Books: The Getaway / 361

Two nights ago I finished Jim Thompson’s “The Getaway,” the book on which the movie starting Steve McQueen and Ali McGraw was based. I loved the movie, and wouldn’t mind seeing it again. The movie followed the book in some ways, but there were major differences.

The book was very good until the last ten pages or so, when the main characters end up in Mexico. Then it got really strange. I’m really not sure what happened in those pages, or what Thompson was thinking. The movie ending was superb, on the other hand.

Last night I finished Donald Westlake’s “361,” another novel in which the protagonists (as in “The Getaway”) are criminals. My first Westlake novel. Will definitely read more.

Share Button
Comments Off on Books: The Getaway / 361

Three Parkers and One Chandler

4mysteries.jpg

During my vacation last week, I finished four books, all detective novels. No difficult or edifying reading.

Three of them were novels by Robert Parker, one from each of the series he has going right now. The first was “Sea Change,” the fifth book in the Jesse Stone series, the police chief in Paradise, Mass. Then I read “Blue Screen,” the fifth in the series about spunky private eye Sunny Randall. And then came “Bad Business,” the 30-somethingth Spencer novel. I’m actually behind on my Spencer reading; two other Spencer novels, written after “Bad Business,” also cohabit on my shelves.

The interesting thing is that Parker is cross-polinating (a very appropriate word) his characters. Jesse Stone has shown up in two previous Spencer books, and he was mentioned in “Bad Business.” In “Sea Change,” Stone interacted with Rita Fiore, a recurring character in Spencer novels. But it got real interesting in “Blue Screen.” Sunny Randall and Jesse Stone spent most of the book together, getting increasingly cozy. I believe Rita Fiore was mentioned. And then it turns out that Sunny’s therapist is Susan Silverman–Spencer’s girlfriend.

All of this makes Parker’s books great fun. I need to read more closely to pay attention to other overlaps.

Rather than launch into another Spencer book, I picked up Raymond Chandler’s “The Lady in the Lake.” Robert Parker (with PI Spencer) is considered the successor to Chandler (with PI Philip Marlowe). This was my fourth Chandler book. Chandler is amazing with slick analogies and witty turns of the tongue, and his plots are far more involved than Parker’s. You really need to read a Chandler book over a period of a couple of days, rather than piece it out over a longer period of time, because you’ll lose track of the characters and their sundry shenanigans. I spent two days on “The Lady in the Lake,” and for the first time, felt like I had a good handle on everything that happened in the book.

Chandler can be very funny. But in my view, Parker’s much funnier. Plus, Parker has a way of quickly defining unique characters. I’ve tried to figure out how he does it. He’ll introduce a character and tell a few things about him, and suddenly, I feel like I know the guy.

And then there’s Hawk. The banter between Spencer and Hawk is priceless, always entertaining, and frequently politically uber-incorrect, much to my delight. And they tend to kill a lot of people.

Share Button
Comments Off on Three Parkers and One Chandler

Three Novels from the Bad Guy’s Perspective

3books.jpgHere are three good novels I’ve read in the last year. All are somewhat similar in that the protagonist becomes a murderer.

Two of the books are told first-person by the killer, which is interesting. Jim Thompson’s The Killer Inside Me (1952) is narrated by a sheriff who is also a psychopathic killer, able to kill without conscience. An insurance agent tells the story in James Cain’s Double Indemnity (1936); he plans and carries out the murder of a woman’s husband (with her as his accomplice).

Strangers on a Train, by Patricia Highsmith (1950), was made into an Alfred Hitchcock movie. This story is told second-person, but primarily from the viewpoint of a man who gets caught up in something he can’t get out of.

In all three books, you watch events close in on the killers. This is especially interesting in the Thompson and Cain books, where the killer is telling the tale.

All three books are old, which means they are a lot cleaner than contemporary fare. But though I read plenty of current novels, I’ve not read one written from the point of view of the criminal himself.

Share Button
Comments Off on Three Novels from the Bad Guy’s Perspective

Ordinary Men Doing the Unspeakable

ordinarymen.jpgI read Elie Weisel’s Night as part of a literature class in 11th grade, and ever since, I’ve been drawn to Holocaust literature. It’s not fun stuff to read. It’s pretty horrifying. What draws me? Probably the question which thunders to the forefront with each book: “How could people do this?”

How, indeed. But they did. And they could do it again.

Two weeks ago I finished Ordinary Men, an astounding book which focuses on a reserve police battalion–ordinary men holding ordinary jobs, most too old for the regular army–who got called up as reserve policemen and stationed in Poland. There, they participated in the deaths of 85,000 Jews, either directly executing them or herding them into trains bound for Treblinka and Sobibor.

The author asks:

How did these men first become mass murders? What happened in the unit when they first killed? What choices, if any, did they have, and how did they respond? What happened to the men as the killing stretched on week after week, month after month? [What were] the personal dynamics of how a group of normal, middle-aged German men became mass murderers?

The author magnificently weaves the recorded testimony of numerous men (they went on trial in the 1960s) into a chilling narrative.

In most Holocaust literature and movies, Germans are portrayed almost as caricatures–all without conscience, all Jew-haters, all capable of great evil. But the people who carried out the policies of the true-believer ideologues at the top (Hitler, Himmler, and company) were ordinary people much like you and me caught up in unimaginable events.

This book humanizes the Germans of Reserve Police Battalion 101. You see men who refused to take part in mass executions, and who were excused from doing so. You see Germans leading small groups of Jews into the woods, where they made them lay on the ground, stuck the bayonet at a point on their neck, and then fired in unison. One German killing one Jew, and then they go for another batch. After a few rounds of this, you see soldiers approaching officers and saying, “I can’t do this anymore,” or even just wandering off. You also see reservists who enjoyed what they were asked to do, and you see civilians who wanted to know when the next roundup of Jews would occur, so they could come watch.

Interestingly, “No one could document a single case in which Germans who refused to carry out the killing of unarmed civilians suffered dire consequences.” This was the conclusion of prosecutors in the 1960s, after two decades of trying Nazi war criminals. Ordinary Men focuses a lot on this. You see the peer pressure, the feeling among the solders that they had to “do their part” in the dirty work of executing Jews, and to leave it to your comrades was to let the unit down. But nobody was penalized; they were just given some kind of alternate duty not directly involved in killing. “The battalion had orders to kill Jews, but each individual did not….Since the battalion had to shoot even if individuals did not, refusing to shoot constituted refusing one’s share of an unpleasant collective obligation.”

Anyway, this was a fabulous book with new insights for me. It resonated with my perceptions of how people think and behave, and I can better understand how ordinary people can be caught up as collaborators in horrible atrocities.

Share Button
Comments Off on Ordinary Men Doing the Unspeakable

Some Good Celebrity Attention on Refugees

TravelsBook.jpgYou may be surprised by the author I am about to recommend: Angelina Jolie. Yes, that Angelina, the Hollywood wild-child. Lately she’s been getting some attention because of her role as Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees. I’ve been aware of that for some time. Her movie “Beyond Borders,” with Clive Owen co-starring, involved UNHCR work in Ethiopia, Cambodia, and Chechnya. The DVD extras, spotlighting refugee crises in the world, were illuminating.

Then I read her 2003 book, Notes from My Travels. It’s wonderful–just observations, journal-style, from travels to Africa, Cambodia, Pakistan, and Ecuador. She travels without an entourage–just herself, meeting up with UN people, and often finding herself in potentially dangerous places. Her eye for meaningful detail is impressive. She doesn’t take potshots at America, as you expect celebrities to do. She doesn’t pontificate, doesn’t act like an expert. She just writes what she sees, and with great humility and compassion. And it’s fascinating.

jolie.jpgIn the book’s third paragraph, as she prepares for her first foreign visit–to Sierra Leone, in West Africa–she writes:

“I honestly want to help. I don’t believe I am different from other people. I think we all want justice and equality. We all want a chance for a life with meaning. All of us would like to believe that if we were in a bad situation, someone would help us….I don’t know why I think I can make any kind of difference. All I know is that I want to.”

I was skeptical initially. But she won me over with this passage from a stopover in the Ivory Coast, while en route to Sierra Leone. She is standing in a marketplace, watching people.

“Contrary to our image of this country, it’s people are civilized, strong, proud, stunning people. Any aggressive feeling is pure survival. There is no time for casual or lazy behavior.

“As I wrote that, I realized I am writing as if I am studying people in a zoo.

“I feel stupid and arrogant to think I know anything about these people and their struggles.”

I think of church people I’ve heard, returning from a two-week trip to build a church in Honduras or Jamaica, talking as if they are now experts on that country and have the people thoroughly psycho-analyzed. Jolie avoids any such pretense throughout the book.

Here are some other excerpts.

  • After noting that many of the children in one African refugee camp have scabies: “I would rather get infected than to ever think about pulling my hands away from these little children.”
  • “I can’t imagine what a mother or father or even a husband or wife feels when the people they love most in the world are suffering, and there is nothing they can do. When a mother can’t feed a child. When a father can’t provide for his family. When a husband can’t protect his wife.”
  • While starting her second trip, this one to Cambodia: “I am embarrassed to realize (and to admit) how much I was able to return to my life after Africa….It’s easy to make phone calls and send letters and funds from the comfort and safety of your own home. Maybe I think I should feel guilty for my ability to come and go from these places when others have no choice. I know one thing. I know I appreciate everything more. I am so grateful for my life.”
  • In Cambodia: “We drive beside horse-drawn carts. The horses seem little and skinny. It makes me wonder if animal-rights activists would be upset–probably just sad. It’s strange how sometimes it seems some people care more for their animals than the poor family next door.”
  • In Pakistan, commenting on women wearing full-body burkas. “No one can make eye contact with each other. Children cannot see their mother’s expressions. No individuality–no self–and it is very hot. I bought one and tried it on. I felt like I was in a cage. They are horrible.”
  • In Pakistan: “Some people complain and say UNHCR should do more to help the refugees. This is hard for the staff to hear. These people simply don’t understand the limited funds and cutbacks. As one staff member said, ‘People can complain about us around the world, and governments can criticize our programs. But every day we continue to come face-to-face with hungry, sick people who feel it is up to us to help them.”

She tells the heart-breaking stories of dozens of refugees, with detail that you only pick up when you’re listening intently. Stories of dedicated UN workers, stories of refugee camps. Her observations from Cambodia’s “Genocide Museum” were gut-wrenching.

The book also reminded me of the importance of the United Nations. In the US, right-wing pundits continually say the UN is worthless, that the US should get out. Yes, the UN is seriously flawed and idiotic things happen (just as idiotic things happen in the US Congress). But the UNHCR works in 120 countries, serving 20 million people who are invisible to the rest of the world, people who depend on the UN (including US dollars) for survival. Would God be pleased if America pulled out of the UN, and left so many dispossessed people without any advocates?

Anyway, it’s quite a book. Angelina Jolie doesn’t pretend to be a Christian, but the type of stuff she does, and her spirit amidst it, certainly shows the attitude a Christian should have. And then we just have to figure out the other side, the Hollywood marriage-busting vixen. People often have two sides, I guess, including us church-goers. I just know that I’d gladly hear her speak, but wouldn’t walk across the street to hear Sean Penn or Michael Moore.

Share Button
1 Comment

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives