Yearly Archives: 2018

“Remembrances” of Pearl Harbor

“I remember Pearl Harbor,” President Trump told Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe in June.

There are two things that intrigue me about that.

1. Trump knew he had no actual memory of Pearl Harbor, so he was intentionally lying. Why did he feel the need to lie?

2. Trump apparently thought it was a PLAUSIBLE lie–that he could have actually remembered Pearl Harbor. Which confirms what many others have said–that he has no real sense of history. He doesn’t read, so he’s got some huge information holes.

I don’t know which part intrigues me the most–telling an intentional lie, or nor realizing his lie was totally implausible. I guess the second part.

I’m sure Abe went back to Japan and got a lot of good laughs telling the story.

Share Button
Comments Off on “Remembrances” of Pearl Harbor

John McCain Deserves Better from the President

President Trump’s disdain for John McCain is well-known.

On August 13, when President Trump signed the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act, he talked for 28 minutes without ever mentioning the senator’s name.

John McCain is a national hero. Say his name. He earned it.

That night at a rally, President Trump criticized McCain’s vote on the Affordable Care Act–again, not mentioning his name, but everyone knew who he was talking about. The crowd booed McCain. Think about that. As John McCain lay dying of brain cancer, the President of the United States was prompting thousands of Americans to boo an American war hero.

Trump has been doing this schtick at rallies and other events for most of a year, going back to a rally in Alabama on September 22, 2017. At his prompting, thousands upon thousands of Trump supporters have publicly jeered John McCain.

I would not dirty my shoes going to a rally where people booed a dying war hero. It stuns me. Infuriates me. And yet, I realize I have Facebook friends who will follow wherever the President leads.

At a rally three days before McCain’s death, the President didn’t say anything about the senator. When medical treatment was discontinued, numerous politicians put out statements of support for McCain and the family. President Trump said nothing.

Anticipating John McCain’s death, White House staffers drafted a statement honoring his life and legacy. President Trump nixed it. John Kelly, Sarah Sanders, and other staff reportedly urged the President to release the statement, but the President said no. Instead, he put out a tweet–that’s all John McCain merited, a tweet of 21 words–expressing condolences to the family.

Brit Hume of FoxNews quickly responded to the tweet, “Still not a kind word about McCain himself.” Nothing about his lifetime of service to the country as a soldier and senator.

How did we get to this point? What happened to the Republican Party I grew up with?

The White House will probably put out a full statement later today, and KellyAnn Conway will provide a tidy rationale for the delay. But there should have been no delay, no allowance for the President to nurse petty grievances.

I realize John McCain has been a harsh critic of Donald Trump. He was also, frequently, a thorn in the side to Presidents Obama, Bush, and Clinton. He put principle above party. It’s part of McCain’s greatness. And Presidents need to rise above.

Being a war hero doesn’t make politicians infallible or above criticism over day-to-day statements and policy decisions. But at the end of the man’s life, you honor him.

Share Button
Comments Off on John McCain Deserves Better from the President

Who’s Next?

The first two Republicans who endorsed Donald Trump from the House of Representatives have now been indicted. That raises the question: who was the third?

That would be Scott DesJarlais of Tennessee, who appears to be criminally clean. However, in 2014 it came out that he urged a mistress and his ex-wife to have abortions. Pro-life people call that murder, but it may be okay since he’s a Republican; he won re-election in 2016 by 30 points. Republican lobbyist Elliott Broidy paid a former Playboy Playmate to keep quiet about their affair and her subsequent abortion, and Republicans don’t seem upset about that “murder” either.

Fourth? Tom Marino of Pennsylvania. Trump nominated him to be the US drug czar, but Marino withdrew his name after it was learned that he sponsored legislation that made it harder for the Drug Enforcement Agency to battle the opioid epidemic, and also took $100,000 from the pharmaceutical lobby. He’s still in Congress.

Fifth? Tom Reed of New York, who seems to be keeping his nose clean.

Jeff Sessions, of course, was the first Senator to endorse candidate Trump. He has diligently avoided being involved in obstructing justice. However, that has made Donald Trump and his base very upset with Sessions.

Share Button
Comments Off on Who’s Next?

Enemy of the People?

Katy Tur was an NBC reporter based in London when she was asked to abruptly leave everything and come follow the Trump presidential campaign. She was a highly experienced reporter, yet unknown. She wrote about the campaign in her 2017 book, “Unbelievable.” For me, it was a very fun read.

But there were disturbing parts. During rallies, with reporters confined to a “press cage” of bicycle fences and surrounded by thousands of Trump supporters, Trump would rain down condemnation on the press. “Little Katy” Tur was a favorite target. He would call her out by name, point to her, and call her a liar and a “third rate reporter.” People en masse would turn to her and shout their insults and curses.

She was a young, single woman being targeted amidst a very hostile crowd. “Inside, I’m terrified,” she wrote. “Men are standing on their chairs to get a look at me. They want to see me as they jeer.”

Her Mom sent frantic texts, fearing for her safety. Trump staffers, recognizing the danger Trump had put her in, asked Secret Service agents to escort Katy and her crew to their vehicles. This is what Katy and other reporters, just doing their job, endured every day. And it happened only because of Donald Trump. Nothing like this had ever happened before.

The abuse continued online, from both Trump and his supporters. Tur, a definite target, wrote, “They call me ugly and dumb. They accuse me of sleeping my way to my job. They go after my family, and especially my father, who is transgender. They call me a c**t. They threaten my life. The longer this campaign goes on, the more I expect them to take their online rage into the real world.” One time, in front of Trump Tower, a Trump supporter screamed abuse at her and then spit in her face.

The crowd behavior kept growing uglier, the yelling more abusive. One time, the crowd chanted, “Drop dead, media! Drop dead, media!” For much of the campaign, NBC provided armed protection to all of its employees covering the Trump campaign, both at the rallies and outside of them. This had never been needed in a presidential campaign.

Trump continued calling out Katy Tur by name. One time, security had to stop people trying to get to her. Another time, a CNN reporter sent a picture of a creepy bald man who wouldn’t stop saying her name, and told her to watch out for him.

Trump staffers assured Katy that Trump actually respected her work. One time, before the Access Hollywood tape surfaced, Trump entered a TV studio, walked right up to her, put his hands on her shoulders, and kissed her on the cheek (much to her anger). But for him, criticizing the press was a game, a crowd-pleaser. He got too much mileage out of it. But Katy Tur and others always feared that one crazy fan who didn’t realize it was just a schtick.

The targeting of Katy Tur continues. A couple weeks ago, she said the boos and taunts at rallies are only part of it. “What you do not see are the nasty letters or packages or emails, the threats of physical violence. ‘I hope you get raped and killed,’ one person wrote to me just this week. Not just me, but a couple of my female colleagues as well.”

This is happening only because President Trump continually incites it. More recently, he has amped it up with denunciations of the press as “the enemy of the people.” For the media targets, it’s not a game.

Share Button
Comments Off on Enemy of the People?

Transcribing Trump

I’ve spent hundreds of hours transcribing taped interviews. It’s probably the most tedious thing I do. You often retrace parts over and over, trying to figure out what exactly the person said. One time, as I started interviewing a pastor in a church vestibule, somebody began ringing the church bell. That one was real fun. Probably five minutes of interview and 30 minutes of transcribing.

When people talk–TV shows, sermons, everyday conversations–I often mentally put it in written form. Was that a sentence break? Period or comma? Dash? Quotes or not? Stuff like that. I can’t help myself. Always an editor.

So I sympathize with the poor schmuck who must transcribe President Trump’s spoken words (and since he’s president, SOMEBODY must). Every word of every crazy rally must be transcribed, as a record of history. Imagine doing that. Transcribing President Obama would have been a breeze, but putting President Trump’s words on paper must be nightmarish.

As a small example, consider this July 15 interview, in which the President is really confused about the geography of the British Isles. Somebody had to get it in this form, and it couldn’t have been easy.

“We would make a great deal with the United Kingdom because they have product that we like. I mean they have a lot of great product. They make phenomenal things, you know, and you have different names — you can say ‘England,’ you can say ‘UK,’ you can say ‘United Kingdom’ so many different — you know you have, you have so many different names — Great Britain. I always say: ‘Which one do you prefer? Great Britain?’ You understand what I’m saying?”

That, to me, is a remarkable piece of transcribing.

Share Button
Comments Off on Transcribing Trump

Book: “Woman of God,” by Maxine Paetro

I recently read an unusual James Patterson book called “Woman of God,” written by Maxine Paetro. Of the many writers who author books under the Patterson brand, Paetro is our favorite. And, I suspect, Patterson’s favorite: they both have advertising backgrounds and have known each other since the early 1970s.

Paetro wrote most of the Women’s Murder Club books, and has written several in the Private series (the best ones, IMHO). All are typical murder mysteries. But the stand-alone “Woman of God” is unlike anything else Paetro has written. And though I can’t speak for the zillions of books written under the Patterson brand, I suspect “Woman of God” is unlike anything else with Patterson’s name attached. It’s certainly no murder mystery.

“Woman of God” basically tells the spiritual journey of a young Catholic woman. A good portion of it occurs in South Sudan, where she works with refugees. But other parts occur in Europe and the US. I was quite engrossed by the book, and it treats faith in a positive, respectful way. It was an entirely pleasant surprise.

Share Button
Comments Off on Book: “Woman of God,” by Maxine Paetro

Islanders Threatened with Losing their Home and Country

A couple days ago, I posted about how rising sea levels are overtaking the island nation of Kiribati. I had a list of other islands facing the same prospect of being forced to relocate their populations, but decided to hold it back for a couple days. Didn’t want to overload everyone. Now, here’s that list of imperiled island nations. All of these places have been inhabited for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. As the earth warms, water expands. It’s all happening far more rapidly than occurs naturally.

The Maldives, with 400,000 people inhabiting 1100 islands and atolls south of India. The highest areas are 8 feet above sea level, so any rise is a seriou threat. A rise of three feet will make the Maldives uninhabitable.

The Seychelles, with 95,000 people on 115 islands off the coast of East Africa.

Tuvalu, with 10,000 people living on three islands and six atolls halfway between Australia and Hawaii. Most of the land is less than a meter above sea level. Their prime minister said in 2015, “Any further temperature increase will spell the total demise of Tuvalu.”

Cape Verde, a nation of 10 islands with a half million people off the west coast of Africa.

Micronesia, with 100,000 people inhabiting over 600 mountainous islands and low atolls.

Palau, a chain of eight islands and 250 islets southeast off the Philippines, with 20,000 people.

The Marshall Islands, northwest of Kiribati, with 1100 islands and islets, most of them less than six feet above sea level. Half of the country’s 53,000 people live on the Majuro atoll, which wil be under water if sea level rises another meter.

Five of the Solomon Islands, in the South Pacific, have already disappeared, and another six have lost over 20% of their area. About 580,000 people live on the Solomon Islands.

In 2016, the Inuit villagers of Shishmaref Island, in Alaska, voted to relocate their ancestral home to safer ground.

The population of the Carteret Islands in Papua New Guinea is being relocated, many to the island of Bougainville 50 miles away.

Kiribati bought 6000 acres on Figi as a future home for its people. But Figi itself is threatened. Some islands have high mountains, but people in lower areas are moving inland as the ocean encroaches on them. Nearly 1 million people live in Figi.

About 8000 people live on the Torres Strait Islands between Australia and New Guinea–274 islands. The United Nations declared the approximately 100 residents of Tegua, part of the Torres Strait Islands, the first climate change refugees in 2005.

In a few cases, islands are slowly sinking even as sea water rises, causing a double whammy. In all of these places, islanders build seawalls and plant mangrove trees to counter erosion, but it’s a losing battle. The oceans are rising, and will continue doing so.

Share Button
Comments Off on Islanders Threatened with Losing their Home and Country

Nobody on Kiribati Says Climate Change is a Hoax

For the past five or six years, I’ve been following the plight of Kiribati, a Pacific nation of 33 islands. About 110,000 people live on Kiribati. They’ve been watching rising sea levels eat away at their homeland. While President Trump has repeatedly described climate change as a hoax, nobody on Kiribati believes that. Year by year, they see their homeland disappearing.

About half of the Kiribati people live on Tarawa, an island which saw some of the fiercest fighting of World War II. By 2050, 50-80 percent of Tarawa will be covered with ocean water, which is already contaminating fresh water sources, making it impossible to grow food, and threatening livelihoods. Tides reach into villages; a while back, I read about one village which had to be abandoned. Some islands have already disappeared, forcing people to crowd onto Tarawa.

Kiribati has been inhabited for about 5000 years. But in the years ahead, the entire population will probably need to relocate. Kiribati bought 6000 acres on Fiji’s main island. That will be their new “homeland.” They will continue to exist as a people, but not as a nation. There are discussions about enabling the Kiribati people to continue being recognized as a national body, what is called “ex-situ nationhood,” but I don’t see it happening. It would be akin to recognizing Jews scattered around the world, prior to the establishment of Israel, as a “nation” of sorts, giving them international recognition as a people even while they live as citizens of a geographic country. It’ll be interesting to see what ultimately happens–for them, and for other threatened island nations.

For Kiribati and others, it’s too late for the world to take action against global warming. Processes are in motion, and can’t be stopped.

Former Kiribati president Anote Tong said, “The science is pretty clear: zero emissions, we’ll still go underwater. Unless some drastic work is undertaken, there will be no option. That’s the reality. It’s not a hope. It’s not a desire. It’s the brutal reality.” He said moving is “a matter of survival.”

Many other island nations–the Seychelles, Maldives, Tuvalu, Palau, Solomons, and others–face the same thing, as rising oceans are forcing people to relocate.

Share Button
Comments Off on Nobody on Kiribati Says Climate Change is a Hoax

Beware the Beginnings

In April, George Will wrote a column which has stayed with me. Actually, three words stuck. They’re from a German proverb: “Beware the beginnings.”

Will talked about the power of one person to affect history. Without Hitler, there would have been no Holocaust. But he said Hitler began with small things, and as the years passed, progressed to bigger and worse things. Beware the beginnings, when the small things are happening.

Will mentioned the new fascist government in Hungary, and the growing appetite for authoritarianism, tribalism, and anti-semitism across Europe. It’s still in the early stages…but beware the beginnings.

Many countries are tilting toward authoritarianism. Turkey, The Philippines. Venezuela. Nicaragua. I spoke recently with a missionary from India who says the current government is the worst she has seen in this regard. I’ve been told of alarming ways China is clamping down on religion. Russia, under Putin, is sliding back to its old Soviet ways.

Beware the beginnings.

America used to be a strong voice for freedom and democracy. But President Trump seems uninterested in that role. He loves being around dictators, strongmen, and has raised the idea of indefinite terms for presidents–jokingly, he says, but there are some ideas you just don’t voice in any context. The world is listening, and dictator wannabes are taking heart. I’m sure they see a kindred spirit in Trump.

In the years ahead, amidst silence from the United States, will more and more countries descend into authoritarian rule? Pay attention to what happens.

Beware the beginnings.

Share Button
1 Comment

Do THIS in Remembrance?

I just finished a deeply disturbing book: “The Slavery Question,” written in 1852 by one of my predecessors as the United Brethren editor, John Lawrence. It’s comprehensive, looking at many aspects of slavery. Lawrence describes how American laws treated slaves as livestock. He republishes ads like this: “Large sale of negroes, horses, mules, and cattle.”

Slaves had no rights whatsoever. Legally, anything they acquired or owned belonged to the master. Their marriages had no legal recognition. They had no right to even their own children. A mother could return from the field and find that a child had been sold, never to be seen again. Slaveholders had the legal right to abuse them in any way they wanted. They were, after all, just livestock. Think on that: livestock.

One story shows how deeply the Christian mind can be corrupted.

A southern church needed new silver for serving the communion elements. So they sold a slave, a man, to raise the money. A slaveholder member probably “donated” the slave for that purpose. Every Sunday, when people came forward to celebrate the Lord’s Supper, they took the juice and bread from silver purchased by selling a human being. And it didn’t bother them. They saw it as no different from auctioning off a cow.

I can’t get that story out of my head. These were American Christians.

Share Button
1 Comment

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives