Yearly Archives: 2013

Jack Nicholson in the Locker Room

Sports and film crossed wires in my brain, random synapses fired, and out came the following.

Richie Incognito responds:

Son, we play in a game that has lines, and those lines have to be guarded by men–big, mean, rough men. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Mike Greenberg?

I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Jonathan Martin and you curse the Dolphins. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know, that bullying Jonathan Martin, though unseemly, probably saved quarterbacks.

And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, is good for football. You don’t want the truth, because deep down in places you don’t talk about at Super Bowl parties, you want me on that line. You need me on that line.

We use words like “teamwork,” “concussion,” “trash-talk.” We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending quarterbacks. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a person who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very entertainment that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it! I would rather you just said “thank you” and changed the channel. Otherwise, I suggest you put on shoulder pads and crouch across from a mean, hulking defensive end. Either way, I don’t give a rip how you think I should act!

Share Button
Comments Off on Jack Nicholson in the Locker Room

Writing Class: Commas in a Series

Today, class, let’s talk about commas in a series. Should you use a comma after the second-to-last element, or not?

Correct: The flag was red, white, and blue.
Correct: The flag was red, white and blue.
Incorrect: Telling people that one way or the other is the only correct way.

I, personally, always use the comma. But it’s purely personal preference. Nothing right or wrong about it (unless your job or college teacher requires adherence to a particular stylebook).

However, exceptions can be made to more clearly communicate information:

Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow you die.

On that cheerful, biblical, and hedonistic note–class dismissed.

Share Button
Comments Off on Writing Class: Commas in a Series

When Politicians Combine God and Guns

declaration

A few days ago, I was in a secular small-group setting in which the leader made a gun-rights argument. He mentioned our “unalienable rights,” and kind of combined the Second Amendment and the Declaration of Independence. He said our unalienable rights, including our right to own guns, are “endowed by our Creator.”

I let him go a bit more. I’d heard all of this before. But I eventually felt compelled to speak.

“I understand what you’re saying, but there’s a lot of questionable theology in that,” I said. “In my view, those rights were endowed by political leaders who wrote them into our founding documents, and they became law. I can’t make a theological argument for gun rights coming from God. I won’t even argue that the Bible says God gave us the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

“But it’s in the Declaration of Independence,” he said.

“Then,” I responded, “it’s a matter of whether or not I agree with Thomas Jefferson’s theological interpretation. He wrote those words, not God. Besides, the Declaration of Independence has no legal standing. Not like the Constitution.”

He responded (and I’m recreating a discussion), “If those rights came from the government, then the government can take them away. But if they came from God, they can’t be taken away.”

That is central to Second Amendment arguments. But it misuses God. Go ahead, build your argument for the Second Amendment. But don’t pull God into it.

The Declaration of Independence and Constitution are incredible documents. But at their most basic, they were written by committees of politicians with an agenda. The Declaration should more accurately have said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by the concept of Natural Law with certain unalienable Rights….”

I’ll always be uncomfortable with a committee of politicians making pronouncements about my faith.

Share Button
Comments Off on When Politicians Combine God and Guns

Burning Bridges to NonChristians

Wow, this is a tremendous article by Ed Stetzer. Much for me to take to heart. A few excerpts:

“Statistically, the unchurched lean heavily Democrat. So—and I know it’s just me talking crazy now—if you want to reach the unchurched, maybe constant Facebook/Twitter posts about how stupid Democrats are might be a bad idea….Christians are often unnecessarily burning bridges on the altar of political partisanship.”

“It may be an appropriate missional decision to voluntarily restrict your own freedom to constantly blurt about politics, in order to reach your neighbor who holds a different view.”

“An endless stream of calling people fools or liars–people who your neighbor voted for–just does not make sense for the Christian….The end result is another stumbling block for those we are trying to reach.”

“I want my unchurched neighbors (who are statistically more likely to be Democrat) to know they are welcome in my home and my church, and that I do not hate them or the president for whom they voted.”

“I suggest we tweet thinking more about Jesus and less about politics. That’s just basic Christian prioritization.

Share Button
Comments Off on Burning Bridges to NonChristians

A Sports Win Heals All Wounds

Amazing, the healing power of sports in America.

I learned on the radio this morning that the Red Sox victory in the World Series has cancelled the wounds of the Boston Marathon bombing. The bombing will be remembered no more. The dead will rise, limbs will be restored.

In the same way, when New Orleans won the Super Bowl, everyone forgot about Hurricane Katrina. People who lost their homes and loved ones suddenly declared, “Hey, everything’s okay! We won the Super Bowl!”

What Newtown and Sandy Hook need are winning sports franchises. And maybe the NFL could start teams in Mogadishu and Damascus. You know, to bring healing.

Share Button
Comments Off on A Sports Win Heals All Wounds

The Board of Education

101

Yesterday I listened to “The Five” on FoxNews while driving home from work. They introduced a segment about school discipline by implying that removing spanking from schools was just part of a misguided liberal agenda. But when they discussed the idea, I think none of those hardline conservatives actually believed in school spanking–at last not for their own kids. A couple mentioned being personally spanked when they were schoolkids, but didn’t come out in favor of it now.

So I’m asking my conservative Facebook friends–do you believe spanking should still be allowed in schools?

This means letting other adults…

  • Decide if your child is guilty of something.
  • Decide that the transgression merits a spanking.
  • Decide the severity of the spanking.
  • Carry out the spanking.

Are you okay with that? Have you, if required, signed waivers to let your child be physically punished at school?

Share Button
1 Comment

The Sounds of Civility

Unless you pay attention, you miss how often Americans say “Thank you,” “Have a nice day,” “I’m sorry,” and the like. These are the sounds of civility. Even the tiresome “Did you find what you were looking for?” You hear people bemoan the lack of civility in America, but it’s far from gone.

We all have our anecdotes of rudeness (which I’m not interested in hearing), and the internet is pretty much devoid of civility. Yet, civility abounds in everyday life. Retail and fast food probably lead the way (not so much in other countries). Call it fakish, not genuine–a mere commercial persona. Nevertheless, I always appreciate hearing the sounds of civility.

So pay attention. Notice how often you hear, and hopefully say, words of civility.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Sounds of Civility

Writing Class: the Hyphen

Today, class, let’s talk about hyphens. You find much variation in hyphen usage. There are few rights and wrongs.

Here’s what happens. Two words get linked by a hyphen, but after a few decades (or less), we stop using the hyphen. Many words you use regularly were once hyphenated: throughout, breakdown, guidelines, mindset, worldwide, outcome, outhouse, outpatient, eyewitness.

Those words have made the transition. A number of words are currently in transition, and you’ll see them spelled with and without hyphens (sometimes in the same document). Examples: co-worker, down-size, start-up, jump-start, co-pay, on-going.

When in doubt, people tend to include a hyphen. But in all of the words above, I typically do without. The goal, as always, is clear communication. If the meaning is clear without the hyphen, then why use it?

As an editor not enslaved to a particular stylebook, I adopt a progressive approach, removing hyphens long before stylebooks get around to it. I know where usage will land, so I jump ahead. I’m not alone in doing that, but I’m definitely in the minority.

Most magazines write “web-site.” I write “website.”

Most publications write “e-mail.” I write “email.” However, I write “e-letter,” which I admit appears inconsistent. So sue me.

Class dis-missed.

Share Button
Comments Off on Writing Class: the Hyphen

The French Say No to Ritalin

An interesting piece in Psychology Today explains that in the US, ADHD is viewed as a biological disorder with biological causes, so it is treated biologically–Ritalin, Adderall.

The French view ADHD as a medical condition with underlying social and situational causes. They look at the child’s social context and more commonly treat with counseling and dietary changes. The article says the American system tends to “pathologize much of what is normal childhood behavior.”

I grew up before the Ritalin craze, and don’t recall any classmates taking such medications. Speaking from the sidelines, amidst ignorance and lack of experience as a parent, it seems to me that we’ve gone a bit overboard.

Share Button
1 Comment

There is No Privacy

I’ve heard people discourage signing up for insurance on the exchange, because you must give personal information to the government. As opposed to giving that same information (and more) to a private company that will sell it to other private companies…and, apparently, give it to the government anyway.

Newsflash: the government already knows all about you.

On the Healthcare.gov website, after providing my Social Security number, I was given four multiple choice questions to confirm my identity. One asked the name of the company through which we refinanced our home mortgage in 2002. The correct answer was one of the four choices.

The next question asked the name of the company through which we took out a car loan in 2012. Again, they had the info.

The correct answer to the other two questions was “None of the Above.”

We took out these loans with private companies, and they passed it along to Uncle Sam. Now this info, going back at least 11 years, is all nicely linked with my SS#.

So go ahead and pretend that you just want to keep your private info out of the government’s hands. The truth is–they’ve already got it.

Share Button
Comments Off on There is No Privacy

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives