Yearly Archives: 2012

Why, IMHO, Romney Blew the Election

Rarely is an incumbent as vulnerable at Obama was. With the state of the economy and various other things, he was ripe for getting knocked off. And really, Romney came pretty close. It wouldn’t have taken all that many votes to swing the other way.

So why didn’t it happen? Lots of things conspired against Romney–some fairly, some unfairly. Here’s what I would point to.

  • During the primary, Romney chose to pander to the right wing and got colored by extreme views–on women’s issues, anti-immigration issues, and a militaristic foreign policy. He may have been forced to take such views to win the nomination, but it tarnished him.
  • Romney put out rosy claims–like create 12 million new jobs, and slash the deficit–but wouldn’t explain how he was going to make it happen.
  • Romney’s stupid 47% statement stuck, and was masterfully exploited by the Dems.
  • Romney apparently didn’t think the average person was very smart–that he could change his views on issues and get away with it. It’s astonishing the number of issues on which he has changed his views over the years. Hey, Mitt: people noticed, and it didn’t inspire confidence. (This was a central issue with me.)
  • His position on the auto bailout ultimately hurt him where it counted most–the industrial states, like Ohio and Michigan.
  • The primary, in which the candidates competed over who would build the biggest wall and be toughest on illegal immigrants, severely hurt Romney with Latinos.
  • Romney was tarnished, unfairly, by statements from Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock.
  • Being Mormon didn’t help.
  • Demographically, America is becoming more secular (non-religious) and more ethnic–and the Republican Party isn’t adapting.
  • Hurricane Sandy killed Romney’s momentum.
  • Some other issues that were a factor with me, and may have influenced other independents: his pandering to the Tea Party, his denial of man’s role in global warming, his refusal to denounce the birthers and Muslim-baiters, taking the Grover Norquist pledge, and his commitment to trickle down economics (which doesn’t work).
  • Romney just lacked charisma. He gave it a great shot, but in the end, voters had a hard time being excited about him.

Change just a couple of those factors above–like, no 47% statement and no Todd Akin–and Romney might have won. But reality isn’t nice.

Share Button
Comments Off on Why, IMHO, Romney Blew the Election

My Church at the Smithsonian

Steve with the Wright Brothers. Sorry for the smile. I’m out of step with the serious expressions required at the beginning of the 1900s.

(Sorry for the glare. Amateur photog at work.)

In October, Pam and I enjoyed a few days of vacation in Washington, DC. One of those days was spent mostly at the Air and Space Museum.

In the Wright Brothers exhibit, I was surprised, but delighted, to find the name “Church of the United Brethren in Christ” printed at least three times. I’ve spent my entire career working for the Church of the United Brethren in Christ. Wilbur and Orville Wright were not only involved in the denomination, but their father, Milton, was a prominent bishop. And a bit controversial. Milton led our group away from the larger body (which is now part of the mammoth United Methodist Church) in 1889.

Anyway, I couldn’t help snapping some photos as proof. There was also a photo of the 1900 General Conference, with Bishop Wright standing front and center.

So, church and state–or at least my church–are not entirely separated at the Smithsonian.

Share Button
Comments Off on My Church at the Smithsonian

The Indisputable Redskin Rule

As we all know, everything important in life, including the fate of the world, revolves around the NFL.

Consider the “Redskin Rule.” When the Washington Redskins win their last home game prior to Election Day, the incumbent party wins. When the Redskins lose, the out-of-power party wins. Thus, since the Steelers beat the Redskins in a Monday Night Football game in 2008, Barack Obama won the election.

This has held true for 17 of the past 18 presidential elections–72 years! The only exception was 2004, when George Bush won re-election without a corresponding win by the Redskins.

Why did The Fates allow an exception? Truly a mystery deserving of scrutiny.

And there was scrutiny, resulting in a revision to the Redskin Rule. It’s about the popular vote. When the Redskins lose in their last home game before the presidential election, the party that lost the previous election’s popular vote wins. This would account for Bush’s 2004 victory. Thus: the Redskin Rule is 18 for 18.

Anyway…the Carolina Panthers beat the Redskins yesterday. Which means: Romney will win the election. If you’re the superstitious type.

Share Button
1 Comment

Picking Presidents

I’ve voted in 9 presidential elections, and my record is pretty good: 7-2. But I started out 0-1 after voting for Gerald Ford.

Now you’re wondering about the other election where I picked the wrong person.

Share Button
Comments Off on Picking Presidents

A Quick Trip to Gettysburg

Pam at Gettysburg

On October 24, after spending a lovely two days in Lancaster, Pa., Pam and I drove to Washington, DC. Our journey took us through Gettysburg. So, of course, we had to stop.

The Civil War has commanded my interested since third grade, when I read my first war-related book: “Heroes in Blue and Gray.” It was a book written for kids–shiny cover, big text–at third grade level. And it was a new book at the time, published in 1965, the year I was in third grade.

Each chapter looked at a major battle of the Civil War, and those names carved a place in my mind: Antietam, Chancellorsville, Vicksburg, Shiloh, Fredericksburg, Chickamauga, Bull Run…and, of course, Gettysburg.

Battle maps showed how the forces were arrayed, with a general’s name inside a rectangle; the larger the rectangle, the larger the force.

I studied those maps closely, fascinated by the clash of armies. And the names of those boxed generals, like the names of the battles, were burned into me–Longstreet, Jackson, Burnside, Ewell, Meade, McClellen, Hancock, Reynolds, Sherman, Hood, Thomas, Bragg, Early, Hill….

I’ve visited Gettysburg five or six times now. I attended grades 4-7 in Harrisburg, Pa., and in fifth grade (I think it was), we took a field trip to Gettysburg. Back then, we could crawl through the stone tunnels of Devil’s Den (and I apparently didn’t have claustrophobia), and we scampered over the big rocks on Little Round Top.

I went another time with my family, and I remember taking my grandparents another time. There may have been another visit or two during those years. Somewhere along the line, I bought a little metal souvenir cannon.

As an adult, I visited Gettysburg some years ago with Pam. Then, on October 24, Pam and I visited again.

A new visitor center had been built since my last visit, and it’s very nice, and very big. The tour begins with a short movie about the battle, and continues with the Cyclorama. The Cyclorama is simply spectacular–a huge, wrap-around mural of the battle. I remember seeing it in the previous visitor center, but it had been restored and enlarged, and displayed with excellence. I could have studied it for hours.

The museum itself seems to wander forever. I remembered a few items from my childhood years, like the two bullets that met in mid-air and fused together. And the stories of relatives who fought on opposite sides of the battle.

Soon after the battle, long before the war ended, efforts began to preserve the Gettysburg battlefield and make it a place people could visit. I’m sure it was all commercially driven, but that’s okay. Other battlefields, I imagine, are now covered by homes and factories and shopping centers. But at Gettysburg, you can walk the entire battlefield. You can roam around Little Round Top, walk the path of Pickett’s Charge, and still see canons positioned. It’s a great place, a national treasure. Truly, as Lincoln said, a place consecrated by the brave men, living and dead, who struggled there.

Share Button
1 Comment

The National Mall: It Makes America Proud

Pam with the Washington Monument in the background.

The view from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

The view from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

Last week, Pam and I spent two days on the National Mall in Washington DC, touring museums and walking, endlessly, to see the various monuments. The World War 2, Korean War, and Martin Luther King memorials were new since we were there in the 1990s.

People gripe that government can’t do anything right. I disagree. There are many things that government does well. And one of them is our National Mall. It’s a beautiful, impressive place. And it’s surrounded by many truly impressive, and massive, buildings.

Our National Mall looks like the center of the most powerful country on earth. Walking there, you feel the greatness.

I was particularly struck by the vision of the city’s designers. The land allocated for the National Mall must have seemed excessive at the time, and very empty. It’s a full two miles from the capital to the Lincoln Memorial. Today, the first mile (to the Washington Monument) is lined with museums, and the second mile is filled with memorials and the reflecting pool. But back in 1791, it was probably just undeveloped land. Nothing there.

I’m sure critics protested, “Why would we ever need all of this space?”

The city was designed by a French-born architect who based his plans on great European cities like Paris, Amsterdam, and Milan. Charles L’Enfant planned big, envisioning a city of grand scale, and knew the country would grow into it. What undoubtedly seemed huge back then is now, I would say, just right.

Today, the National Mall is grand, majestic, and full of meaning. The National Mall is, indeed, a national treasure.

Share Button
Comments Off on The National Mall: It Makes America Proud

Boom Time for Ewoks

Now that Disney owns Lucasfilm and Star Wars, does that mean we’ll soon have Jar Jar Binks walking around Disney theme parks, scaring little children?

On the other hand, it will be a jobs bonanza for little people, as they line up to apply to be Ewoks and Yoda. Plus, someone will have a great post-NBA career as Chewbacca.

Share Button
1 Comment

Danger, Will Robinson!

I saw this sign posted outside of an Office Depot store. I took it as a warning. I thought maybe the store was under quarantine and I should stay away.

Share Button
Comments Off on Danger, Will Robinson!

The Gospel Beyond the Evangelical Version

Ed Stetzer, the Southern Baptist researcher from LifeWay Christian Resources, recommended this post by John Blake on CNN’s Belief blog. It’s called “The Gospel According to Obama.” As Stetzer said, “You won’t agree with it all, but I think you will learn something from it.”

I found some fascinating insights, particularly in regard to the American black church. We have caricatured Rev. Wright to death because of a few stupid statements, and shamelessly implied that everything true of Wright is true of Obama. But there is much more to Obama’s faith than these caricatures, and there is much we evangelicals can learn from the black church.

We white evangelicals are pretty insulated and, to be blunt, legalistic. We think the American evangelical experience is the ultimate and only true expression of Christianity. Anything else is non-Orthodox, compromised, and possibly heretical. People outside the United States don’t have a proper understanding of Christianity, so we send missionaries and conduct conferences to show them how to do it right. To enlighten them.

But that is such a shallow, paternalistic view of the faith.

In particular, we reject anything with “social gospel” attached to it. That stems from a 1950s-era backlash–not entirely a bad thing–against the mainstream Protestant church, which had sorely neglected the salvation message. But we have swung too far in the other direction. A good deal of Jesus’ message was social in nature, and we can’t discount it. The black church, to its credit, has never discounted it.

Years ago, I was part of the organizing committee for the first joint convention between the two main religious press organizations, the Evangelical Press Association and its mainstream (“liberal”) counterpart, the Associated Church Press. I don’t think it went particularly well–our two groups were very different. And yet, I learned a lot. I remember when an ACP person gave a prayer, and I thought, “Why don’t we evangelicals pray about those things?” There were other things they emphasized which I found eye-opening, in a good way–issues of justice and compassion that we evangelicals just don’t focus on.

Likewise, in attending a service at an all-black church many years ago, I discovered expressions of the faith that were foreign to me, but which I realized were totally valid.

We evangelicals think we’ve got it all figured out. But there are holes in our gospel.

And so, read John Blake’s article with an open mind–not a partisan mind–and see what God teaches you about aspects of the Christian faith which are missing or unstressed in your evangelical tradition. It’s quite a long article, but puts a lot of religious issues into context. I found it insightful.

A quote near the end says, “What’s interesting is that these values, associated with Obama and the black Protestant tradition, are now also the values of a growing number of white evangelicals.” That is what I’ve seen, and it’s a healthy thing.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Gospel Beyond the Evangelical Version

Visiting the Holocaust Museum

Last Thursday, October 25, Pam and I visited the Holocaust museum in Washington, DC. One of our first vacations as a married couple, back in the early 1980s, was to Washington DC. But that was before the Holocaust museum opened. So this was at the top of our list.

I’ve read many books about the Holocaust. It has always fascinated me–how evil, truly evil, ordinary people can become. So obviously, the Holocaust Museum held high interest for me.

Here are a few thoughts.

You can’t help noticing the silence. Hundreds of people all around you, exploring the exhibits…and rarely a word spoken. Even the many schoolchildren, brought to the museum on field trips, were generally respectful.

The museum made great use of video, including so much stuff I had never seen. Including some very disturbing footage. The main videos–maybe 5-10 minutes apiece, perhaps five of them scattered throughout the museum in places with seating–were well worth watching. The first told of anti-semitism through the ages; the next told about the rise of anti-semitism in Germany. But in addition to these mini-features, numerous exhibits were accompanied by a small monitor showing footage. Very well used. And very disturbing…which was the point.

The room with shoes–thousands of shoes left at extermination camps by Jews, each pair worn by an actual person who was murdered–was riveting.

And the room with high, high walls filled with photos of Jews from one town–families, couples, individuals. Photos taken during happy times. Hundreds of them. I couldn’t help looking into the faces in those photos and wondering what those persons were like, what they endured, and how they died.

Perhaps my favorite part came toward the end, with a wall commemorating all the people who had helped rescue Jews. Hundreds of names listed. With some–perhaps 40 persons–they briefly told the person’s story. It reminded me of stories in Eva Fogelman’s book “Conscience and Courage: Rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust,” which I read some years ago and still have on my shelf. In fact, I recognized at least one of the stories from the book.

It’s great to know that, amidst such evil, numerous people possess the courage to do what is right, even at the risk of torture and death–which was the fate of some of these rescuers.

There were so many items from the Holocaust. Prison uniforms. Medical instruments. Beds from prison camps. Part of the Warsaw Ghetto wall. A train car used to transport Jews to extermination camps. Each telling a piece of a tragedy of epic proportions.

At the end came an exhibit about genocide in modern times–Bosnia, Rwanda, the Sudan. This was by far the weakest part of the museum. I wish they had just focused on the Holocaust. But the big sign out from said “Never Forget,” and that refers to continuing acts of genocide.

Share Button
Comments Off on Visiting the Holocaust Museum

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives