Monthly Archives: October 2008

Pre-Debate Thoughts

I predict another boring debate, unless McCain comes out with something new and bold. Which he probably needs to do.

Mike Murphy, on Swampland, says, “Obama’s mission is simple. Kill the clock. Act Presidential. Hope nothing happens. He’s winning.” Probably true. He had some other excellent advice for McCain.

Here’s what I’m most looking forward to: the live-blogging by Karen Tumulty, Mike Grunwald, and Jim Poniewozik. It’s a load of fun.

Share Button
Comments Off on Pre-Debate Thoughts

Jodie – This One’s For You

God_Jets_500.jpg

Share Button
Comments Off on Jodie – This One’s For You

Another Option for the Poor Goes Away

I just learned that Taylor University is closing its Fort Wayne campus.

  • It started out as Fort Wayne Bible College.
  • It became Summit Christian College.
  • Then, following what some describe as a hostile takeover by Taylor University, it became Taylor University – Fort Wayne.

Now it’ll be no more. About 200 employees will be affected. That includes a variety of people I know (including at least one person at Anchor).

The Fort Wayne campus served a lot of urban, lower-income students. The Upland, Ind., campus is known for being a hot-bed of rich kids. So once again, the poor get shafted.

I’ve been greatly impressed with the students at Taylor-Fort Wayne, and with their mission-mindedness in serving Christ throughout the city. They live within a big mission field on the city’s messed-up south side, and they represent Christ well. These kids will be missed. I imagine most will end up at Indiana Purdue – Fort Wayne.

I’m sure Taylor U didn’t make this decision lightly. But I see churches leaving the neighborhood where Anchor is located, fleeing to the richer suburbs. And now Taylor does something similar. I wonder what Jesus thinks.

Share Button
Comments Off on Another Option for the Poor Goes Away

Politics: This and That

  • Pam’s been getting lots of mailings from the Obama campaign. She must be in some heavily-targeted demographic (married 40-something white women without kids????). Printing companies are having a heyday.
  • An illuminating Time story about Troopergate and the ham-handedness of the Palin administration (and her husband’s out-sized role). Doesn’t inspire confidence.
  • I greatly respect how John McCain has handled some of the loony comments being made in town-hall meetings about Obama. While his own campaign has shamefully spawned and encouraged some of these comments, McCain is very publicly denouncing comments from his own supporters. Interesting.
  • Last week, Anderson Cooper (CNN) did a report detailing all of Obama’s interactions over the years with William Ayres. It was pretty extensive, far beyond what Obama admits. (Though I have trouble getting worked up about it.)
  • I really enjoy “The Vote Blog,” from the Christian Science Monitor website. Balanced and witty.
  • With all the attention on the presidential campaign, I’m not hearing anything about other important races, like Senate seats. Usually, these gets plenty of press.
  • Watched Mike Huckabee’s new show on Fox, Saturday night at 8:00. Kinda interesting. Interviewed Chuck Norris–interesting, but not much substance. But loved the band number at the end (all band members being Fox employees, with Huck on the bass). They did “Mustang Sally” this week.
  • General Petraeus talks about negotiating with your enemies and preconditions. Good stuff.
  • Turns out the National Security Agency has been listening to calls from any US citizens calling from the Middle East–aid works, journalists, tourists, soldiers–“Americans who are not in any way, shape, or form associated with anything to do with terrorism….Calling home to the United States, talking to their spouses, sometimes their girlfriends.” NSA monitors would jokingly share recordings of pillow talk between US military officers and their spouses. Protecting the world for democracy and freedom, by violating civil and privacy rights.
  • The general who led the Abu Ghraib investigation, Antonio Taguba, believes the Bush Administration should be charged with war crimes for the torture and mistreatment of prisoners. I agree. But it’ll never happen (unless the Europeans take the lead).
  • So Sarah Palin will appear on Saturday Night Live this week. Smart move for her. Really. She’ll gain points. Says Palin of Tina Fey, “I love her, she’s a hoot and she’s so talented. It would be fun to meet her and keep on giving her new material.”
Share Button
Comments Off on Politics: This and That

Getting Rid of the Hiccups

After we ate yesterday at Dog & Suds, Pam got the hiccups. And it reminded me.

I was probably in fourth grade at the time. Some TV show–it might have been Candid Camera–sent someone around asking people, “How do you get rid of the hiccups?”

One person said, “I think of seven bald-headed men.”

Sounds silly, but: it worked me me. I kid you not. I would start thinking about bald guys in our church, and the hiccups would go away. I didn’t even need to reach seven.

I’m serious. This worked for me. For years.

Share Button
Comments Off on Getting Rid of the Hiccups

The Other Siblings

Republican family values can be interesting sometimes. We have Joe Biden, who traveled home every night from Washington. And we have John McCain, who has been largely absent from his kids’ lives. But the Republican is the “family values” person.

Cindy McCain likes to call herself an only child, and she was the sole inheritor of her father’s beer fortune. But she actually has two half-sisters, one from her father’s first marriage and one from her mother’s first marriage.

Cindy’s father died in 2000. He left his other daughter, Kathleen Portalski, $10,000. Meanwhile, Cindy got a couple hundred million dollars. She was not only disinherited, but Cindy won’t even acknowledge her existance. Even at the funeral, in her eulogy, Cindy told the crowd she was “his only child.” While Kathleen sat nearby, dumbfounded.

Would Cindy want her family of blended children to treat each other that way? I can’t imagine Pam and her half-sister treating each other that way. They don’t even like being called half-sisters, and will probably chew me out for mentioning it. They are sisters in every way.

Aren’t these legitimate concerns for a Christian to raise?

There are so many ways in which I think Cindy McCain is great. And yet…if you insist on seeing the world (and politics) only in black and white, there’s a lot you must ignore. Life and people are messy.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Other Siblings

Swampland’s Live Blog

You must read the transcript of the Swampland live-blog of the debate, by reporters Karen Tumulty, Michael Grunwald, and James Poniewozik. It’s hysterical. They started a half hour before the debate started, and continued to the end, injecting snide little comments throughout. Here are snippets:

  • Poniewozik: “Staffer who gave Obama the current price of gas in Nashville gets a little something extra in his paycheck this week.
  • Tumulty: “It really is feeling like Short Attentin Span Theater.”
  • Poniewozik: “What does Soledad O’Brien think about again being consigned to undecided-voter-panel hell in Columbus again?
  • Tumulty: “What’s with the stools. Is this “Cheers”?
  • Poniewozik: “There will be an acoustic guitar segment.”
  • Grunwald: “It’s like they take turns delivering their stump speeches.”
  • Poniewozik: “Somewhere, Bill Clinton is throwing things at the TV.”
  • Tumulty: “I’m very distracted by McCain standing behind Obama and looking really, really mad.”
  • Grunwald: “This format sucks. It’s just side-by-side stump speeches with human props.”
  • Poniewozik: “Congratulations, Commission on Presidential Debates! You managed to take an encounter with real Americans and drain it of any possible human interest!”
Share Button
Comments Off on Swampland’s Live Blog

Thoughts on Debate 2

Some of my reactions to last night’s second presidential debate:

  • BORING!
  • Debates seem to sap every ounce of charisma out of Obama.
  • I found myself terribly annoyed at both of them for ignoring the agreed-upon time structures. They both see themselves as above the rules.
  • Once, when Brokaw admonished them about following the time limits, Obama said he was just trying to keep up with McCain. Which is a totally leaderless way of whining, “He started it!”
  • I fell asleep halfway through.
  • I guess they did deal with issues, just in a droning kind of way.
  • Where’s the witty, smiling, happy warrior McCain of 2000?
  • Obama continually used up all his time, and then would say, “I’d like to make one more point.” Really annoying.
  • Toward the end, I thought McCain was launching into another tedious “preconditions” rant. (Jesus said that when you have problems with someone, you go talk to them. I apply that view to international relations, which is why I’m in line with Obama on this. Talking is better than pouting.)
  • McCain could take shots and just brush them off. But Obama was defensive, wanting to correct every perceived misstatement. As I said before: chill, dude.
  • On Morning Joe this morning, they were lamenting that there wasn’t a baseball game they could switch to.
  • People are making too much over McCain’s “that one” statement. In such a dull debate, it’s hard finding something to talk about.
  • I found McCain’s answers easier to follow than Obama’s. But when I didn’t drift off, I liked Obama’s answers.
  • McCain really really dislikes Obama.
  • They both worked hard at contriving empathy for voters and for the people asking questions. I think we all saw through it. Obama and McCain didn’t truly “feel your pain.”
  • Okay, John, we got it: you’re a maverick. Jolly.
  • They’re saying Obama won because he didn’t lose. Maybe so. But he was somewhat diminished in my eyes. No great vision or hint of charisma (unlike the first debate).
  • Michael Scherer notes that, “The key to the classic McCain town hall is that McCain is having fun. He did not appear to be having fun tonight.”
  • McCain seemed to disappear real soon after the debate ended, while Obama stuck around. What’s with that?
Share Button
2 Comments

Is This Really a Deterrent?

liquorladies500.jpg

I mean, really. How many men would give up drinking if “faced” with a threat like this? Or maybe the men of the early 1900s were more character-driven.

Share Button
2 Comments

God on the Internet

Wanna be stretched?

An Alabama pastor, while attending the Innovate Conference in Granger, Ind., felt it was important to baptize one of his parishioners NOW. Not to wait until he returned to Alabama. So he conducted a baptism over the internet, with live video. Five days later, that girl died suddenly of an aortic aneurysm.

Tim Stevens, a pastor at Granger Community Church, tells about the baptism on his blog, and you can watch a video of the baptism. It gave me goosebumps.

Get used to this kind of thing happening. Imagine:

  • A pastor conducting a wedding over the internet, though he and the couple are in different states (or continents!).
  • Using the internet to dedicate the child of missionaries from your church who are serving overseas (as the entire congregation watches on a big screen).
  • Accepting new members into your church over the internet.

I’m sure the advent of radio preaching drew criticisms that people were substituting the radio for actual church attendance. Likewise with TV preaching. While we can agree that gathering with other believers is what God fully desires, it’s also true that radio and TV have reached a lot of people for Christ–people who, otherwise, might never have heard the Gospel.

Now we have podcasts and video streaming of church services, so people can “attend church” at their convenience. Nurses and policemen who work Sunday mornings can download a video of the service and watch it when they can. This is a good thing.

We also have multicasting–a pastor’s message is beamed to churches in several other locations. Last October, Pam and I attended a church where the message was being seen in several locations in that facility (including their own coffee cafe).

You can argue all you want about how “This isn’t what God intended.” But though I’ll always prefer the face-to-face, I have difficulty seeing technological tools as being anti-biblical.

The Apostle Paul himself was high-tech, for his day. He used letters to instruct, admonish, and encourage. He couldn’t be there in person, so he wrote letters. Letters which were multicasted from town to town, millennium to millennium. Jesus never wrote letters (that we know of). But we believe Paul’s letters were divinely inspired.

So why can’t God, likewise, be totally present in that internet baptism?

Share Button
Comments Off on God on the Internet

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives