Yearly Archives: 2007

Don’t Move, and I’ll Let You Breathe

Heard a great story of good triumphing over evil this morning.

Randy Fennig pastors our United Brethren church in Springfield, Ohio, and is preparing to head to Sierra Leone as a missionary. This weekend, he and his wife visited a daughter in Spain, while their two sons stayed back in Springfield.

A career criminal broke into the parsonage. He disturbed the cat, which woke up the sons, both of whom are wrestlers. They apprehended the criminal. One son put the thief in an illegal wrestling hold and told him, “Let me offer you an arrangement. If you don’t move, I’ll let you breathe.”

The guy was evidently still breathing when the police arrived and hauled him to jail.

Share Button
Comments Off on Don’t Move, and I’ll Let You Breathe

March Winds Bring April…Snow Flurries?

Snowing outside. Had some huge flakes yesterday, but today it’s actually been accumulating. Not much, but hey, it’s supposed to be spring! I was going to mow my yard today!

Share Button
Comments Off on March Winds Bring April…Snow Flurries?

Sanjayah–Rising Above

I’m ready to get on the Sanjayah bandwagon. Earlier, when better singers got voted off and the judges showed their displeasure that Sanjayah was remaining, I felt sorry for him. He had a hang-dog look, and I felt like he would probably be relieved when he finally got let go.

But the kid has spunk. He’s making the best of the situation, milking it for all it’s worth. He’s not trying to wow the judges with his singing, but playing to the crowd with showmanship. I loved his little dance with Paula last week. And who isn’t curious about what he’ll do with his hair next? He turned an object of ridicule into a huge asset.

So, I say, “Go Sanjayah! You’re caught in forces way beyond your control, and you’re making the most of it. I salute your spunk.”

Share Button
Comments Off on Sanjayah–Rising Above

The Other Easter Resurrectees

Last night at church, we discussed the crucifixion scene in Matthew 27. We talked some about verses 52-53, which say, “The tombs broke open and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. They came out of the tombs, and after Jesus’ resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people.”

We kind of skip over this part when talking about the Holy Week events. Why is that? Seems like a pretty significant thing to me. And it raises all kinds of questions.

  • How long had some of these people been dead? Months? Years? Decades?
  • It says the tombs “broke open.” Did people notice this? Did they go check out the situation and find them empty, or find formerly dead people walking around?
  • These dead people came to life, but didn’t go into the city until after Jesus rose from the dead. Why the wait? What did they do in the meantime? What did they do for food? Were they hanging around Jesus’ tomb, waiting for him to come to life? If so, did it freak out the women, when they came to the tomb?
  • It says these people “appeared” to many people. Did they stick around, or disappear? Did they also ascend into heaven, or did they continue living and eventually die again? Did any of them marry and have kids, who would perhaps be contemporaries of their own great-grandkids? What did they do for a living? Were they there when Jesus ascended into heaven?
  • What influence did these people have on the early church? The Bible doesn’t refer to them, but they must have been hanging around somewhere.
  • Did these people believe in Jesus? They were “holy” people, but probably some never knew Jesus when they were alive (either because they lived before Christ, or they just didn’t have the opportunity to run into him). Did they have to be “converted” to Christ (away from Judaism)?

There is a whole lot between the lines of these two verses.

Share Button
3 Comments

Three Novels from the Bad Guy’s Perspective

3books.jpgHere are three good novels I’ve read in the last year. All are somewhat similar in that the protagonist becomes a murderer.

Two of the books are told first-person by the killer, which is interesting. Jim Thompson’s The Killer Inside Me (1952) is narrated by a sheriff who is also a psychopathic killer, able to kill without conscience. An insurance agent tells the story in James Cain’s Double Indemnity (1936); he plans and carries out the murder of a woman’s husband (with her as his accomplice).

Strangers on a Train, by Patricia Highsmith (1950), was made into an Alfred Hitchcock movie. This story is told second-person, but primarily from the viewpoint of a man who gets caught up in something he can’t get out of.

In all three books, you watch events close in on the killers. This is especially interesting in the Thompson and Cain books, where the killer is telling the tale.

All three books are old, which means they are a lot cleaner than contemporary fare. But though I read plenty of current novels, I’ve not read one written from the point of view of the criminal himself.

Share Button
Comments Off on Three Novels from the Bad Guy’s Perspective

Disappointments at Starbucks

I went to Starbucks twice last week. Both days, they were still brewing the decaf and I’m not inclined to wait several minutes; one day I left, the other I reluctantly settled for something different. Today, both their decaf and bold were the Komodo Dragon coffee, which is way too strong for me, so I decided to skip getting coffee today. I needed some Lightnote coffee ground–but I couldn’t find any decaf bags. So I left.

That’s three consecutive disappointing visits to Starbucks. Just shouldn’t happen.

Oh, the travails of living in 21st Century America!

Share Button
Comments Off on Disappointments at Starbucks

Ordinary Men Doing the Unspeakable

ordinarymen.jpgI read Elie Weisel’s Night as part of a literature class in 11th grade, and ever since, I’ve been drawn to Holocaust literature. It’s not fun stuff to read. It’s pretty horrifying. What draws me? Probably the question which thunders to the forefront with each book: “How could people do this?”

How, indeed. But they did. And they could do it again.

Two weeks ago I finished Ordinary Men, an astounding book which focuses on a reserve police battalion–ordinary men holding ordinary jobs, most too old for the regular army–who got called up as reserve policemen and stationed in Poland. There, they participated in the deaths of 85,000 Jews, either directly executing them or herding them into trains bound for Treblinka and Sobibor.

The author asks:

How did these men first become mass murders? What happened in the unit when they first killed? What choices, if any, did they have, and how did they respond? What happened to the men as the killing stretched on week after week, month after month? [What were] the personal dynamics of how a group of normal, middle-aged German men became mass murderers?

The author magnificently weaves the recorded testimony of numerous men (they went on trial in the 1960s) into a chilling narrative.

In most Holocaust literature and movies, Germans are portrayed almost as caricatures–all without conscience, all Jew-haters, all capable of great evil. But the people who carried out the policies of the true-believer ideologues at the top (Hitler, Himmler, and company) were ordinary people much like you and me caught up in unimaginable events.

This book humanizes the Germans of Reserve Police Battalion 101. You see men who refused to take part in mass executions, and who were excused from doing so. You see Germans leading small groups of Jews into the woods, where they made them lay on the ground, stuck the bayonet at a point on their neck, and then fired in unison. One German killing one Jew, and then they go for another batch. After a few rounds of this, you see soldiers approaching officers and saying, “I can’t do this anymore,” or even just wandering off. You also see reservists who enjoyed what they were asked to do, and you see civilians who wanted to know when the next roundup of Jews would occur, so they could come watch.

Interestingly, “No one could document a single case in which Germans who refused to carry out the killing of unarmed civilians suffered dire consequences.” This was the conclusion of prosecutors in the 1960s, after two decades of trying Nazi war criminals. Ordinary Men focuses a lot on this. You see the peer pressure, the feeling among the solders that they had to “do their part” in the dirty work of executing Jews, and to leave it to your comrades was to let the unit down. But nobody was penalized; they were just given some kind of alternate duty not directly involved in killing. “The battalion had orders to kill Jews, but each individual did not….Since the battalion had to shoot even if individuals did not, refusing to shoot constituted refusing one’s share of an unpleasant collective obligation.”

Anyway, this was a fabulous book with new insights for me. It resonated with my perceptions of how people think and behave, and I can better understand how ordinary people can be caught up as collaborators in horrible atrocities.

Share Button
Comments Off on Ordinary Men Doing the Unspeakable

The Other Side of Disappointment

Two weeks ago, I posted about my disappointment of setting up a meeting with several 20-something young men, and then nobody showed up. I said I’d give it another week.

Well, last week three guys showed up. Dan, Allen, and RJ. We sat around a table in the sanctuary (our sanctuary seating includes four large round tables, and people flock to them), and I walked them through the bridge illustration. I just wanted to determine where they were in their understanding of the Gospel and their personal experience with Christ. I wrote out some questions for them to respond to before we started chatting, things like: “I consider myself a Christian,” “I think I’ll go to heaven when I die,” “It’s possible to know for certain that you’re going to heaven,” and a couple more. Each question had four possible responses: Yes, No, I Think So, I’m Not Sure.

I tell you, it was a lot of fun. They all drew out the bridge, and then we moved on to the three Campus Crusade circles (with Christ on the throne, with Christ at the foot of the throne, and with Christ not even in the circle). I find those very helpful in picturing the three types of lives.

We talked about sin and forgiveness and Christ’s death and eternal separation and “accepting Christ as Savior.” I did a lot of probing, and by the end of the hour, I felt confident that all three were, indeed, Christians. So I guess I’m not gonna get any notches in my belt.

This past Monday night, Dan and RJ showed up. I had typed out about eight subjects on a sheet of paper, and we informally discussed four of them–The Church, the Holy Spirit, the Bible, and Witnessing. I am very comfortable leading a free-flowing, unstructured discussion, and that’s what is required with these guys. I learned a great deal about them, things that surprised me. And they want to keep the discussion going next week.

So, disappointment turned into great reward for me.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Other Side of Disappointment

Subversive Questions About Family

Pastor Tim wasn’t supposed to preach today. He and Tara were supposed to have their new baby last week, and Tim’s dad, Gerald, was slotted to speak in his place. But the baby, alas, seems in no hurry to greet the world. And so there he was, speaking about pride, one of the Seven Deadly Sins in this “Vice-Busters” series.

He’s been using a Bible figure with each sin, and today he used Joseph–that spoiled kid who thought he was better than his brothers (and was, actually, but that’s beside the point)–to go along with pride. As an aside, Tim pointed out that, if you want good models of family life, the Bible is not the place to go. That’s certainly true. You don’t find healthy families in the Bible, just lots of dysfunction.

Why is that? When God put the Bible together, he was fully aware of what he was leaving out.

We’re big on the family–family time, family values, strengthening the family, protecting the family, etc. We want our churches to be family-oriented, and we constantly stress the need for strong families. We take the gloves off in the political arena to protect our view of the “traditional,” as-God-intended-it family.

You would think the family is a central theme of the Bible. But it’s not. Why is that? Is it okay to ask that? Does God view the family differently than we do? Is our view of the family wrapped up in our culture? Why didn’t God ever chastise those Old Testament heroes for having multiple wives? Did God care, or not? Don’t worry–I’m not headed toward advocating polygamy or gay marriage. I’m just askin’. In sort of a quasi-heretical way.

When Jesus spoke about the family, it was usually about alienating family members and redefining the family as the total body of Christ (“For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother”). The New Testament writers give some basic instructions regarding family roles, parenting, and husband-wife relationships, but not as much attention as they give to church roles.

Why doesn’t the Bible give us examples of good families? “What about Mary and Joseph?” you ask. But for all we know, Joseph, despite his superb start, could have become an alcoholic and committed suicide with a nail gun. We don’t know.

Is there some heavenly paradigm that we’re missing? And could that be the reason so many “good Christian families” go haywire? Are we doing family in a way which seems right to us, but isn’t really what God had in mind? Am I going absolutely nuts?

Okay, I can tell that you’re getting really really mad, so I’ll stop. But…I’m just askin’.

Share Button
2 Comments

Email Obsession

The last thing I do each day, before leaving work, is check my email. Well, almost the last thing. I then close the email program, start the screen saver, and put the rechargeable mouse in its cradle. Then I leave.

It’s a nice, liesurely, 25-minute drive home, during which I typically listen to ESPN, which has nothing new to contribute to my life. Upon arriving home, I turn on the computer and…check my email.

Because, after all, it’s been a full 25 minutes since I last checked.

Share Button
Comments Off on Email Obsession

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives