Monthly Archives: June 2006

Rejoice and Be Glad?

Today we finally caught up with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. A long time ago I watched the video of the beheading of Nick Berg–brutal stuff, made me sick. Al-Zarqawi wielded the knife. Now we can watch the video of the house where he died being blown up.

I’m not sorry to see him dead. By no means. But lately I’ve been reading some stuff by authors who also happen to be in the non-violence camp, and there’s so much that they say that is resonating with me, a moderate-to-hard-liner. I’m still not sorry to see Al-Zarqawi dead. But I’m no longer able to rejoice in it, to feel gleeful. I don’t know what’s happening to me, but curiously, I feel good about my feelings. As if I’m catching a little bit of how Jesus might feel.

Share Button
Comments Off on Rejoice and Be Glad?

Can’t See the Neighbors for the Trees

I’m a bit disturbed right now. I’m spending the morning at home, waiting for the water softener guy to come. And out back, behind the house to our south, two guys are chainsawing two perfectly good trees and grinding them up in a noisy wood chipper. This makes no sense to me. I almost went out and told them that. “Those are superb trees. Leave them alone.”

But now only stumps remain, and all is quiet.

When we moved into this house, a field was in back of our property. That afforded privacy not always available in the suburbs. But during the past six years or so they’ve been building houses in the field. One of the few lots left is directly behind us. And it looks like they’re getting ready to build.

We knew, years ago, that this day would come. So we’ve been planting trees and bushes at the back of our property, a privacy barrier between us and our eventual neighbor. We have bushes on the side of our house to shield us from those neighbors. They’ve planted similar bushes. This is the valuable function that plants provide. Welcome to the suburbs.

And now, some idiots have cut down two mature trees, two wonderful privacy barriers. What’s with that?

Then I thought of a few paragraphs I read last night in The Irresistible Revolution, a highly subversive book by Shane Claiborne which I fear will chainsaw my conscience for a long time. He said that as our culture makes personal property “private” property–meaning, our home is a sanctuary, and we don’t want to be disturbed there–then corporate meeting places become more important. Which is why we spend millions on our sacred shrines. The early church of Acts met in homes, they shared, they were hospitable. Lots of home-to-home stuff. No castle sanctuaries there. So they didn’t need separate buildings. Homes sufficed.

Claiborne writes, “So as congregations build larger buildings, gyms, and food courts, we find ourselves less likely to meet in homes and kitchens and around dinner tables. We end up centralizing worship on corporate space or ‘on campus.’ Hospitality becomes less of a necessity and more of an optional matter, a convenient privilege. On the other hand, as members open their homes and yards and share vehicles and recreation spaces, less and less corporate property is necessary.”

I suspect that the early apostles would have chainsawed those trees, just to increase their access to the neighbors.

Share Button
Comments Off on Can’t See the Neighbors for the Trees

Elegant and Complex

This morning at Starbucks I got the Guatemala Antigua coffee, a mild brew. The chalkboard described it as “elegant and complex.” It tasted good. But now I feel like Angelina Jolie. Please make it stop.

Share Button
1 Comment

Movie Recap

As we surveyed the movie listings on Saturday, it came down to “The DaVinci Code” or “X-Men 3.” We decided to save “DaVinci” for video, and went to “X-Men.” Lots of fun. And yes, we stayed to the end of the closing credits for that final scene. And just what was that all about? Who’s Moira?

A couple weeks ago we saw United 93“United 93.” At that point, Pam and I hadn’t been to the theatre all year. Tax season pretty much takes Pam out of circulation. “United 93” was superb. I found that, from the beginning, I was tense. I knew what was coming, and the memory of the real thing was still fresh. When the movie ended, most people stuck around throughout the credits, all of them. We did. Don’t know why. It just seemed appropriate.

Then we’ve seen a few movies on video recently.

  • A History of Violence.” Wow, that was a good movie. And very violent, too, I should add for the kiddies. Aragorn (that’s his real name, isn’t it?) did a superb piece of acting.
  • Flightplan.” This Jodie Foster flick was better than I expected. Or maybe not. I’m not sure what I expected. But it was above average.
  • Domino.” Starting watching this Tony Scott movie last night. Fifteen minutes in, I said, “Okay, too much cussing,” and we turned it off and put it back in the Netflix envelope.
  • Aeon Flux.” A nice futuristic movie with Charlize Theron in an action role. Enjoyed it a lot.
Share Button
Comments Off on Movie Recap

The Taylor Van Tragedy

taylorgirls.jpgEveryone in Fort Wayne has been talking about a tragedy which occurred five weeks ago, when a semi truck crossed the median on I-69 and struck a van carrying people from Taylor University, killing five of them. One girl was in a coma for five weeks, and she was identified as Laura VanRyn (left). But when she came out of the coma, she identified herself as Whitney Cerak (right)–a classmate who had been named among the dead. A case of mistaken identification.

What makes the story extra amazing is the response of the two families involved (especially the VanRyns, who had been keeping a bedside vigil over a girl who, it turns out, was not their daughter after all). I was going to write about this. It’s such an unusual, compelling story. But now I see a post by Ed Gebert on his blog about the whole thing. No reason for me to plow the same ground.

Share Button
Comments Off on The Taylor Van Tragedy

George Barna Invents a Revolution

I finally got around to reading George Barna’s “Revolution,” a controversial little tome. Our bishop sent a copy to all UB pastors, and it upset some of them. Which I can understand. The book upset me. Barna, in a passive-aggressive way, basically cheers for the demise of the local church. He predicts that in the next 20 years, today’s churches will lose a huge percentage of their people, as those parishioners seek spiritual fulfillment outside of the church. This is his “Revolution,” a fundamental change in the American religious landscape. In this new world, Barna seems to contend, the truly spiritual warriors will be the people who abandon the church. What a delightful theory.

This is not a new idea to me. In 1993 I read William Hendricks wonderful book “Exit Interviews: Revealing Stories of Why People are Leaving Church.” The book told the stories of a number of actual people with real names (something Barna doesn’t do), helping us understand their spiritual journey and why they left the church, and how they keep the flame alive. It greatly broadened my view of how God sometimes chooses to work.

[Warning: This is a long post. Excrutiatingly long. Full of half-baked opinions flavored with heaping tablespoons of ignorance, subjectivity, and general immaturity. You’re advised to stop. Right now. Seriously.]

We’ve all met nonChristians who say, “I’m not interesting in becoming a Christian, because I’ve known so many Christians who are hypocrites.” And we say, “Don’t give up on Christianity because of Christians.”

Barna basically affirms the thought, “I’m not interesting in being part of a local church, because too many local churches are ineffective.” To which I say, “Find a good church. They exist everywhere.”

Read more »

Share Button
2 Comments

Dilbert Wonders About Talking to God

I’m becoming an increasingly big fan of the Dilbert Blog. Scott Adams is truly a hilarious writer, and a great thinker (though twisted). He’s not exactly a big fan of Christians or religion in general, and certainly not of Republicans (I love it when he writes about political issues), but I enjoy his stuff regardless. Especially today’s post which he titles “Talking to God.” It’s really quite funny.

I’m not a fan of bloggers who just compile links to other places. I prefer creating my own havoc, rather than lazily recycling somebody else’s. But every once in a while I can’t help myself, and this is one of those times.

Share Button
Comments Off on Dilbert Wonders About Talking to God

Page 3 of 3123

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.

Categories

Facebook

Monthly Archives